Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25411033›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2014

A blended- rather than whole-lentil meal with or without α-galactosidase mildly increases healthy adults' appetite but not their glycemic response.

Katherene O-B Anguah, Brittany S Wonnell, Wayne W Campbell, George P McCabe, Megan A McCrory

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02110511 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Bean Form and Digestive Enzyme Availability on Postprandial Responses

TypeinterventionalSponsorPurdue UniversityRan2011 to 2012Enrolled14ConditionsAppetite and Glucose ResponsesArmsblended lentils, whole lentils, no lentils
NCT04611217 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Mechanisms Linking Dietary Fiber, the Microbiome and Satiety

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaRan2021 to 2025Enrolled88ConditionsDietary FiberArmsDietary fiber: 10-25g, Dietary fiber: 5g
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherene O-B AnguahDepartments of Nutrition Science Ingestive Behavior Research Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Brittany S WonnellDepartments of Nutrition Science.
Wayne W CampbellDepartments of Nutrition Science Ingestive Behavior Research Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
George P McCabeStatistics, and.
Megan A McCroryDepartments of Nutrition Science Psychological Sciences and the Ingestive Behavior Research Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Department of Nutrition, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA mmccrory@gsu.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USGeorgia State University · US

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisrupting the physical structure of pulses by blending them or by using a digestive supplement (α-galactosidase) to reduce intestinal discomfort could potentially negate the previously observed beneficial effects of whole pulses of lowering appetitive and glycemic responses because of more rapid digestion.

objectiveWe hypothesized that blended lentils, α-galactosidase, or both increase postprandial appetite and blood glucose responses vs. whole lentils.

methodsMen and women [n = 12; means ± SDs body mass index (kg/m(2)): 23.3 ± 3.1; aged 28 ± 10 y] consumed breakfast meals containing whole (W), blended (B), or no lentils [control (C)], each with 3 α-galactosidase or placebo capsules in a randomized, crossover, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Between each test day there was a 3- to 5-d washout period.

resultsMixed-model ANOVA showed effects of meal on postprandial appetite and glucose (P = 0.0001-0.031). The B meal resulted in higher postprandial appetite ratings than did the W meal but not the C meal for hunger, desire to eat, and prospective consumption (Δ = 0.4-0.5 points; P = 0.002-0.044). Postprandial glucose concentration was 4.5 mg/dL lower for the B meal than for the C meal (P < 0.0001) but did not differ from the W meal. There were no main effects of α-galactosidase, but there were meal × α-galactosidase interaction effects, with a greater postprandial desire to eat and lower postprandial fullness with the B meal than with the 2 other meals in the placebo condition but not in the α-galactosidase condition.

conclusionsBlending lentils increased appetite (∼6%), but not glycemic response, compared with whole lentils, whereas α-galactosidase did not. Both B and W meals may be consumed (with or without an α-galactosidase supplement) with little impact on appetite, without increasing glycemic response. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02110511.

Indexed as

AppetiteLens PlantMealsAdolescentAdultalpha-GalactosidaseBlood GlucoseBody CompositionBody Mass IndexCross-Over StudiesDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodEnergy IntakeEnergy MetabolismFemaleHealthy Volunteersalpha-GalactosidaseBlood GlucoseappetiteglucosehumansLentilsα-galactosidase

Identifiers

PMID25411033
PMCPMC4230209
OpenAlexW1992261375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.