ReviewJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2015
Biotechnological application and taxonomical distribution of plant growth promoting actinobacteria.
Review in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selenium nanoparticles fromiScience · 2026Article
- Impacts of Climate, Organic Management, and Degradation Status on Soil Biodiversity in Agroecosystems Worldwide.Global change biology · 2025Article
- I-SVVS: integrative stochastic variational variable selection to explore joint patterns of multi-omics microbiome data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Salt stress alters the selectivity of mature pecan for the rhizosphere community and its associated functional traits.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Soil bacterial responses to experimental warming and drought across winter wheat growth stages in the North China Plain.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Rootstock-specific bacterial microbiome and metabolome remodeling enhances glycine substitution efficacy for ammonium nitrate in watermelon.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Alpine and subalpine plant microbiome mediated plants adapt to the cold environment: A systematic review.Environmental microbiome · 2024Review
- Effects of Paecilomyces lilacinus and Bacillus pumilus on stem nematode and rhizosphere bacterial communities of sweet potato.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Exploring the dynamics of ISR signaling in maize upon seed priming with plant growth promoting actinobacteria isolated from tea rhizosphere of Darjeeling.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Metagenomic evaluation of peanut rhizosphere microbiome from the farms of Saurashtra regions of Gujarat, India.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characterization of the olive endophytic community in genotypes displaying a contrasting response to Xylella fastidiosa.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- The Role of Soil Microbial Consortia in Sustainable Cereal Crop Residue Management.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Genotype Combinations Drive Variability in the Microbiome Configuration of the Rhizosphere of Maize/Bean Intercropping System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Cultural techniques capture diverse phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in rock phosphate-enriched habitats.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Isolation and identification of endophytic actinobacteria fromFood science & nutrition · 2023Article
- Actinomycetes as Producers of Biologically Active Terpenoids: Current Trends and Patents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Volatile and Dissolved Organic Carbon Sources Have Distinct Effects on Microbial Activity, Nitrogen Content, and Bacterial Communities in Soil.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Nitrogen Fertilizer Type and Genotype as Drivers of P Acquisition and Rhizosphere Microbiota Assembly in Juvenile Maize Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Composition and characteristics of soil microbial communities in cotton fields with different incidences of Verticillium wilt.Plant signaling & behavior · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant growth promoting (PGP) bacteria are involved in various interactions known to affect plant fitness and soil quality, thereby increasing the productivity of agriculture and stability of soil. Although the potential of actinobacteria in antibiotic production is well-investigated, their capacity to enhance plant growth is not fully surveyed. Due to the following justifications, PGP actinobacteria (PGPA) can be considered as a more promising taxonomical group of PGP bacteria: (1) high numbers of actinobacteria per gram of soil and their filamentous nature, (2) genome dedicated to the secondary metabolite production (~5 to 10 %) is distinctively more than that of other bacteria and (3) number of plant growth promoter genera reported from actinobacteria is 1.3 times higher than that of other bacteria. Mechanisms by which PGPA contribute to the plant growth by association are: (a) enhancing nutrients availability, (b) regulation of plant metabolism, (c) decreasing environmental stress, (d) control of phytopathogens and (e) improvement of soil texture. Taxonomical and chemical diversity of PGPA and their biotechnological application along with their associated challenges are summarized in this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25410828What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.