Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25410730›Full record

ArticleMicrobes and environments2014

A fine-scale phylogenetic analysis of free-living Burkholderia species in sugarcane field soil.

Kanako Tago, Hideomi Itoh, Yoshitomo Kikuchi, Tomoyuki Hori, Yuya Sato, Atsushi Nagayama, Takashi Okubo, Ronald Navarro, Tomo Aoyagi, Kentaro Hayashi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbes and environments, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Host-symbiont specificity determined by microbe-microbe competition in an insect gut.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A selective genome-guided method for environmental Burkholderia isolation.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Symbiosis Studies in Microbial Ecology.Microbes and environments · 2016
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kanako TagoEnvironmental Biofunction Division, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences.
Hideomi Itoh
Yoshitomo Kikuchi
Tomoyuki Hori
Yuya Sato
Atsushi Nagayama
Takashi Okubo
Ronald Navarro
Tomo Aoyagi
Kentaro Hayashi
Masahito Hayatsu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity and abundance of Burkholderia species in sugarcane field soils were investigated by a 16S rRNA gene-based approach using genus-specific primers. A total of 365,721 sequences generated by the Illumina MiSeq platform were assigned to the genus Burkholderia. Nearly 58% of these sequences were placed in a previously defined cluster, including stinkbug symbionts. Quantitative PCR analysis revealed a consistent number of 16S rRNA gene copies for Burkholderia species (10(7) g(-1) soil) across the sampled fields. C/N, pH, and nitrate concentrations were important factors shaping the Burkholderia community structure; however, their impacts were not significant considering the overall genus size.

Indexed as

BiotaPhylogenySoil MicrobiologyBurkholderiaCarbonCluster AnalysisDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMolecular Sequence DataNitratesNitrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSaccharumSequence Analysis, DNASoilCarbonDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalNitratesNitrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil

Identifiers

PMID25410730
PMCPMC4262370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.