Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25410693›Full record

ArticleHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2014

The untold story: examining Ontario's community health centres' initiatives to address upstream determinants of health.

Patricia A Collins, Sarah J Resendes, James R Dunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Concept Analysis and Proposed Definition ofJournal of primary care & community health
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Measuring Scope of Practice Enactment Among Primary Care Registered Nurses.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020
    Article
  13. Supporting patients to shape social determinants of health through democratic engagement.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. "It's not a food issue; it's an income issue": using Nutritious Food Basket costing for health equity advocacy.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Framework for building primary care capacity to address the social determinants of health.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017
    Article
  19. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien
    Article
  20. Typology of virtual primary care in Canada: Making the implications clear.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia A CollinsAssistant Professor, School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
Sarah J ResendesBusiness Connector - The Prince's Charities Canada, Toronto, ON.
James R DunnAssociate Professor, Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnlike traditional primary care centres, part of the Community Health Centre (CHC) mandate is to address upstream health determinants. In Ontario, CHCs refer to these activities as Community Initiatives (CIs); yet, little is known about how CIs operate. The objective of this study was to examine the scope, resource requirements, partnerships, successes and challenges among selected Ontario CIs.

methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with 10 CHC staff members representing 11 CIs across Ontario. CIs were identified through an online inventory, recruited by e-mail and interviewed between March and June 2011.

resultsMost CIs aim to increase community participation, while addressing social isolation and poverty. They draw minimal financial resources from their CHC, and employ highly skilled staff to support implementation. Most enlist support from various partners, and use numerous methods for community engagement. Successes include improved community relations, increased opportunities for education and employment and rewarding partnerships, while insufficient funding was a commonly identified challenge.

conclusionsDespite minimal attention from researchers and funders, our findings suggest that CIs play key capacity-building roles in vulnerable communities across Ontario, and warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsHealth PromotionCommunity Health CentersHumansInterviews as TopicOntarioPrimary Health CareQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID25410693
PMCPMC4253893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.