Amenable (or avoidable) mortality as an indicator of health system effectiveness.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Association between childhood adversities and premature and potentially avoidable mortality in adulthood: a population-based study.BMC public health · 2023
   Article
2. Untimely applause was a distraction. Comment on "Shanghai rising: health improvements as measured by avoidable mortality since 2000".International journal of health policy and management · 2015
   Article
3. Comparing COVID-19 mortality across selected states in India: The role of age structure.Clinical epidemiology and global health
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  What, if anything, does amenable mortality tell us about regional health system performance?2013
• Comment on
  Examining the role of amenable mortality as an indicator of health system effectiveness.2014

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as