Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25410604›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Inconsistent condom use by male clients during anal intercourse with occasional and regular female sex workers (FSWs): survey findings from southern states of India.

Shreena Ramanathan, Karikalan Nagarajan, Lakshmi Ramakrishnan, Mandar K Mainkar, Prabuddhagopal Goswami, Diwakar Yadav, Shrabanti Sen, Bitra George, Harikumar Rachakulla, Thilakavathi Subramanian and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Correlates of Lifetime History of Purchasing Sex Services by Men in Saint Petersburg and Leningrad Oblast, Russia.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shreena RamanathanDepartment of M&E, Knowledge Network, DAKSH, FHI 360, New Delhi, India.
Karikalan NagarajanNational AIDS Research Institute (NARI), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Lakshmi RamakrishnanFHI 360, New Delhi, India.
Mandar K MainkarNational AIDS Research Institute (NARI), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Prabuddhagopal GoswamiFHI 360, New Delhi, India.
Diwakar YadavFHI 360, New Delhi, India.
Shrabanti SenFHI 360, New Delhi, India.
Bitra GeorgeFHI 360, New Delhi, India.
Harikumar RachakullaNational Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Thilakavathi SubramanianNational Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ramesh S ParanjapeNational AIDS Research Institute (NARI), Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSelf-reported anal intercourse by female sex workers (FSWs) documented in recent studies from India range between 11.9% and 22%. However, comparable data on anal intercourse and condom use from male clients of FSWs is lacking. Using data from a bio-behavioural survey (2009-2010), we examined prevalence of anal intercourse, male clients' self-reported inconsistent condom use during anal intercourse with FSWs, and correlates of this behaviour in India's high HIV prevalence southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu combined).

methodsUsing two-stage time location cluster sampling, we recruited 4803 clients of FSWs, ages 18-60 years, who had purchased sex from an FSW in the past month. After obtaining informed consent, respondents were interviewed and tested for HIV and sexually transmitted infections (syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with inconsistent condom use during anal intercourse (in the past 6 months) with FSWs.

resultsOverall, 12.3% clients reported anal intercourse in the past 6 months, of whom 48.4% used condoms inconsistently. Clients of FSWs who were ages 26 years or older (AOR 2.68, p=0.032); employed as manual labourers (AOR 2.43, p=0.013); consumed alcohol (AOR 2.63, p=0.001); reported five or more sex acts with FSWs in the past month (AOR 2.53, p=0.031); and perceived themselves to be at higher risk for HIV (AOR 4.82, p=0.001) were more likely to inconsistently use condoms during anal intercourse.

conclusionsThe results suggest that sex workers and their clients commonly practice anal intercourse, but a relatively high proportion of clients do not consistently use condoms, leading to a greater risk of acquiring HIV and its further transmission to other male and female sexual partners. Given the multidirectional risk, safer sex communication on heterosexual anal intercourse must be incorporated into HIV prevention programmes.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorAdolescentAdultCluster AnalysisCondomsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSexual BehaviorSex WorkSex WorkersYoung AdultEPIDEMIOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID25410604
PMCPMC4244455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.