Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25410206›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2015

Protective immunity against infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis.

Chelsea A E Hicks, Barbara Willi, Barbara Riond, Marilisa Novacco, Marina L Meli, Christopher R Stokes, Christopher R Helps, Regina Hofmann-Lehmann, Séverine Tasker

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chelsea A E HicksSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom Center for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Barbara WilliClinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Barbara RiondClinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marilisa NovaccoClinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Center for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marina L MeliClinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Center for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christopher R StokesSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Christopher R HelpsSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Regina Hofmann-LehmannClinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Center for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Séverine TaskerSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom S.Tasker@bristol.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemoplasmas are potentially zoonotic mycoplasmal pathogens, which are not consistently cleared by antibiotic therapy. Mycoplasma haemofelis is the most pathogenic feline hemoplasma species. The aim of this study was to determine how cats previously infected with M. haemofelis that had recovered reacted when rechallenged with M. haemofelis and to characterize the immune response following de novo M. haemofelis infection and rechallenge. Five specific-pathogen-free (SPF)-derived naive cats (group A) and five cats that had recovered from M. haemofelis infection (group B) were inoculated subcutaneously with M. haemofelis. Blood M. haemofelis loads were measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR), antibody response to heat shock protein 70 (DnaK) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), blood lymphocyte cell subtypes by flow cytometry, and cytokine mRNA levels by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. Group A cats all became infected with high bacterial loads and seroconverted, while group B cats were protected from reinfection, thus providing the unique opportunity to study the immunological parameters associated with this protective immune response against M. haemofelis. First, a strong humoral response to DnaK was only observed in group A, demonstrating that an antibody response to DnaK is not important for protective immunity. Second, proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) mRNA levels appeared to increase rapidly postinoculation in group B, indicating a possible role in protective immunity. Third, an increase in IL-12p35 and -p40 mRNA and decrease in the Th2/Th1 ratio observed in group A suggest that a Th1-type response is important in primary infection. This is the first study to demonstrate protective immunity against M. haemofelis reinfection, and it provides important information for potential future hemoplasma vaccine design.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacterial LoadBloodCat DiseasesCatsCytokinesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFlow CytometryGene Expression ProfilingHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsLymphocytesMaleMycoplasmaMycoplasma InfectionsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAntibodies, BacterialCytokinesHSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25410206
PMCPMC4278926
OpenAlexW2166853483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.