ArticleWorld journal of surgery2015
Rate of pulmonary metastasis varies with location of rectal cancer in the patients undergoing curative resection.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of a prognostic nomogram for lung metastasis in locally advanced rectal cancer incorporating molecular markers.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- A large population-based and validated study on the follow-up management and supportive strategy of locally advanced rectal cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Analysis of risk characteristics for early progression and late progression in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a large population-based and validated study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Survival after curative resection for stage I colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Beware of Early Relapse in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.Annals of coloproctology · 2020Article
- Late-Onset Lung Metastasis in Rectum Cancer Can Be Confused with Primary Lung Cancer; a Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2019Review
- The prognostic implications of primary tumor location on recurrence in early-stage colorectal cancer with no associated risk factors.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018Article
- Pulmonary metastasis in rectal cancer: a retrospective study of clinicopathological characteristics of 404 patients in Chinese cohort.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Identification of Recurrence-Predictive Indicators in Stage I Colorectal Cancer.World journal of surgery · 2017Article
- New advances in the use of patient-derived organoids and mouse models for assessing heterogeneity among metastatic colorectal cancers.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecise understanding of recurrence patterns permits efficient surveillance and effective treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate recurrence patterns after treatment of rectal cancers, specifically with respect to tumor location and chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
methodsA single-institution, retrospective cohort of 2,086 consecutive rectal cancer patients, was enrolled between January 2000 and December 2007. All the patients underwent curative operations (R0). Tumor location was classified into lower (≤5 cm), middle (>5 to ≤8 cm), and upper (>8 cm) groups based on the distance of the inferior tumor border from the anal verge; the patients were also characterized according to whether they received preoperative/postoperative CRT.
resultsThe lung was the most common recurrence site in the lower group (lower vs. middle/upper; 14.6 vs. 8.9%/8.0%, P = 0.001/0.001). Recurrence patterns were not associated with receipt of preoperative/postoperative CRT. Additionally, RT and CRT did not reduce the rate of pulmonary recurrence (no-RT/preoperative CRT/postoperative CRT, 37.5/37.9/42.6%; P = 0.13). In a multivariate analysis, preoperative level of serum carcinoembryonic antigen, abdominoperineal resection, advanced T category, N category, and circumferential resection margin were identified as independent risk factors for pulmonary recurrence in all groups. Otherwise, low rectal cancer was associated with unresectable pulmonary recurrence (RR = 2.19; 95% CI 1.012-3.072; P = 0.04).
conclusionsNeither RT nor CRT affects the pattern and rate of recurrence. Tumor location specifically affects recurrence in rectal cancer patients, such that the lower group is a risk factor for unresectable pulmonary recurrences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25409839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.