Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25409776›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

CASPER plus (CollAborative care in Screen-Positive EldeRs with major depressive disorder): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Karen Overend, Helen Lewis, Della Bailey, Kate Bosanquet, Carolyn Chew-Graham, David Ekers, Samantha Gascoyne, Deborah Hems, John Holmes, Ada Keding and 11 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Behavioural activation therapy for depression in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen Overend
Helen Lewis
Della Bailey
Kate Bosanquet
Carolyn Chew-Graham
David Ekers
Samantha Gascoyne
Deborah Hems
John Holmes
Ada Keding
Dean McMillan
Shaista Meer
Jodi Meredith
Natasha Mitchell
Sarah Nutbrown
Steve Parrott
David Richards
Gemma Traviss
Dominic Trépel
Rebecca Woodhouse
Simon GilbodyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree, Building, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. simon.gilbody@york.ac.uk.
University of York · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBCentre for Mental Health · GBKeele University · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/57/43Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression accounts for the greatest disease burden of all mental health disorders, contributes heavily to healthcare costs, and by 2020 is set to become the second largest cause of global disability. Although 10% to 16% of people aged 65 years and over are likely to experience depressive symptoms, the condition is under-diagnosed and often inadequately treated in primary care. Later-life depression is associated with chronic illness and disability, cognitive impairment and social isolation. With a progressively ageing population it becomes increasingly important to refine strategies to identity and manage depression in older people. Currently, management may be limited to the prescription of antidepressants where there may be poor concordance; older people may lack awareness of psychosocial interventions and general practitioners may neglect to offer this treatment option. METHODS/

designCASPER Plus is a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of a collaborative care intervention for individuals aged 65 years and over experiencing moderate to severe depression. Selected practices in the North of England identify potentially eligible patients and invite them to participate in the study. A diagnostic interview is carried out and participants with major depressive disorder are randomised to either collaborative care or usual care. The recruitment target is 450 participants. The intervention, behavioural activation and medication management in a collaborative care framework, has been adapted to meet the complex needs of older people. It is delivered over eight to 10 weekly sessions by a case manager liaising with general practitioners. The trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of collaborative care in addition to usual GP care versus usual GP care alone. The primary clinical outcome, depression severity, will be measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at baseline, 4, 12 and 18 months. Cost effectiveness analysis will assess health-related quality of life using the SF-12 and EQ-5D and will examine cost-consequences of collaborative care. A qualitative process evaluation will be undertaken to explore acceptability, gauge the extent to which the intervention is implemented and to explore sustainability beyond the clinical trial. DISCUSSION: Results will add to existing evidence and a positive outcome may lead to the commissioning of this model of service in primary care.

trial registrationISRCTN45842879 (24 July 2012).

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareResearch DesignAgedAge FactorsAntidepressive AgentsCase ManagementClinical ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyCooperative BehaviorCosts and Cost AnalysisEnglandGeneral PractitionersHealth Care CostsAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID25409776
PMCPMC4247639
OpenAlexW2148504089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.