Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25409744›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2015

Enzyme enhancers for the treatment of Fabry and Pompe disease.

Jan Lukas, Anne-Marie Pockrandt, Susanne Seemann, Muhammad Sharif, Franziska Runge, Susann Pohlers, Chaonan Zheng, Anne Gläser, Matthias Beller, Arndt Rolfs and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pharmacological Chaperone Therapy for Pompe Disease.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan LukasAlbrecht Kossel Institute, Medical University Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Anne-Marie PockrandtAlbrecht Kossel Institute, Medical University Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Susanne SeemannAlbrecht Kossel Institute, Medical University Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Muhammad Sharif1] Leibniz Institute for Catalysis, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany [2] Department of Chemistry, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Franziska RungeAlbrecht Kossel Institute, Medical University Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Susann PohlersAlbrecht Kossel Institute, Medical University Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Chaonan Zheng1] Albrecht Kossel Institute, Medical University Rostock, Rostock, Germany [2] Leibniz Institute for Catalysis, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Anne GläserAlbrecht Kossel Institute, Medical University Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Matthias BellerLeibniz Institute for Catalysis, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Arndt RolfsAlbrecht Kossel Institute, Medical University Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Anne-Katrin GieseAlbrecht Kossel Institute, Medical University Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
University of Rostock · DELeibniz Institute for Catalysis · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lysosomal storage disorders (LSD) are a group of heterogeneous diseases caused by compromised enzyme function leading to multiple organ failure. Therapeutic approaches involve enzyme replacement (ERT), which is effective for a substantial fraction of patients. However, there are still concerns about a number of issues including tissue penetrance, generation of host antibodies against the therapeutic enzyme, and financial aspects, which render this therapy suboptimal for many cases. Treatment with pharmacological chaperones (PC) was recognized as a possible alternative to ERT, because a great number of mutations do not completely abolish enzyme function, but rather trigger degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum. The theory behind PC is that they can stabilize enzymes with remaining function, avoid degradation and thereby ameliorate disease symptoms. We tested several compounds in order to identify novel small molecules that prevent premature degradation of the mutant lysosomal enzymes α-galactosidase A (for Fabry disease (FD)) and acid α-glucosidase (GAA) (for Pompe disease (PD)). We discovered that the expectorant Ambroxol when used in conjunction with known PC resulted in a significant enhancement of mutant α-galactosidase A and GAA activities. Rosiglitazone was effective on α-galactosidase A either as a monotherapy or when administered in combination with the PC 1-deoxygalactonojirimycin. We therefore propose both drugs as potential enhancers of pharmacological chaperones in FD and PD to improve current treatment strategies.

Indexed as

1-DeoxynojirimycinAcetylcysteinealpha-Galactosidasealpha-GlucosidasesAmbroxolBezafibrateEnzyme ActivatorsFabry DiseaseGene ExpressionGlycogen Storage Disease Type IIHEK293 CellsHumansLeupeptinsLysosomesPioglitazonePlasmids1-DeoxynojirimycinAcetylcysteinealpha-Galactosidasealpha-GlucosidasesAmbroxolbenzyloxycarbonylleucyl-leucyl-leucine aldehydeBezafibrateEnzyme ActivatorsGAA protein, humanGLA protein, humanlactacystinLeupeptinsmigalastatPioglitazoneProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteasome InhibitorsRecombinant ProteinsThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID25409744
PMCPMC4351457
OpenAlexW1966747269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.