Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25409520›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Distinct epidermal keratinocytes respond to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields differently.

Chao-Ying Huang, Chun-Yu Chuang, Wun-Yi Shu, Cheng-Wei Chang, Chaang-Ray Chen, Tai-Ching Fan, Ian C Hsu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao-Ying HuangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chun-Yu ChuangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Wun-Yi ShuInstitute of Statistics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Cheng-Wei ChangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chaang-Ray ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Tai-Ching FanMagnet Group, Instrumentation Development Division, National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Ian C HsuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
National Tsing Hua University · TWNational Synchrotron Radiation Research Center · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following an increase in the use of electric appliances that can generate 50 or 60 Hz electromagnetic fields, concerns have intensified regarding the biological effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) on human health. Previous epidemiological studies have suggested the carcinogenic potential of environmental exposure to ELF-EMFs, specifically at 50 or 60 Hz. However, the biological mechanism facilitating the effects of ELF-EMFs remains unclear. Cellular studies have yielded inconsistent results regarding the biological effects of ELF-EMFs. The inconsistent results might have been due to diverse cell types. In our previous study, we indicated that 1.5 mT, 60 Hz ELF-EMFs will cause G1 arrest through the activation of the ATM-Chk2-p21 pathway in human keratinocyte HaCaT cells. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether ELF-EMFs cause similar effects in a distinct epidermal keratinocyte, primary normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK), by using the same ELF-EMF exposure system and experimental design. We observed that ELF-EMFs exerted no effects on cell growth, cell proliferation, cell cycle distribution, and the activation of ATM signaling pathway in NHEK cells. We demonstrated that the 2 epidermal keratinocytes responded to ELF-EMFs differently. To further validate this finding, we simultaneously exposed the NHEK and HaCaT cells to ELF-EMFs in the same incubator for 168 h and observed the cell growths. The simultaneous exposure of the two cell types results showed that the NHEK and HaCaT cells exhibited distinct responses to ELF-EMFs. Thus, we confirmed that the biological effects of ELF-EMFs in epidermal keratinocytes are cell type specific. Our findings may partially explain the inconsistent results of previous studies when comparing results across various experimental models.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic FieldsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCheckpoint Kinase 2Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Epidermal CellsG1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHumansHydrogen PeroxideKeratinocytesPhosphorylationSignal TransductionUltraviolet RaysAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Hydrogen Peroxide

Identifiers

PMID25409520
PMCPMC4237442
OpenAlexW2000561670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.