Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25409446›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

In how many ways is the approximate number system associated with exact calculation?

Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas, Guilherme Wood, André Knops, Helga Krinzinger, Jan Lonnemann, Isabella Starling-Alves, Klaus Willmes, Vitor Geraldi Haase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Does the approximate number system serve as a foundation for symbolic mathematics?Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pedro Pinheiro-ChagasCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U992, Gif/Yvette, France; NeuroSpin Center, Institute of BioImaging Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Gif/Yvette, France; Developmental Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Guilherme WoodDepartment of Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, Karl-Franzens University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
André KnopsFaculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Helga KrinzingerSection Child Neuropsychology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital of the RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Jan LonnemannGerman Institute for International Educational Research, Frankfurt, Germany; Center for Individual Development and Adaptive Education of Children at Risk (IDeA), Frankfurt, Germany.
Isabella Starling-AlvesDevelopmental Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Klaus WillmesSection Neuropsychology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of the RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Vitor Geraldi HaaseDevelopmental Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Programa de Pós-graduação em Neurociências, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 22577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The approximate number system (ANS) has been consistently found to be associated with math achievement. However, little is known about the interactions between the different instantiations of the ANS and in how many ways they are related to exact calculation. In a cross-sectional design, we investigated the relationship between three measures of ANS acuity (non-symbolic comparison, non-symbolic estimation and non-symbolic addition), their cross-sectional trajectories and specific contributions to exact calculation. Children with mathematical difficulties (MD) and typically achieving (TA) controls attending the first six years of formal schooling participated in the study. The MD group exhibited impairments in multiple instantiations of the ANS compared to their TA peers. The ANS acuity measured by all three tasks positively correlated with age in TA children, while no correlation was found between non-symbolic comparison and age in the MD group. The measures of ANS acuity significantly correlated with each other, reflecting at least in part a common numerosity code. Crucially, we found that non-symbolic estimation partially and non-symbolic addition fully mediated the effects of non-symbolic comparison in exact calculation.

Indexed as

BrazilChildCross-Sectional StudiesEducational MeasurementEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMathematics

Identifiers

PMID25409446
PMCPMC4237330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.