Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25409195›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Comparison of immunity in mice cured of primary/metastatic growth of EMT6 or 4THM breast cancer by chemotherapy or immunotherapy.

Reginald M Gorczynski, Zhiqi Chen, Nuray Erin, Ismat Khatri, Anna Podnos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Deciphering the Dual Role ofVeterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Emerging Immune Checkpoint Molecules on Cancer Cells: CD24 and CD200.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Reginald M GorczynskiUniversity Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zhiqi ChenUniversity Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Nuray ErinDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, Akdeniz University, School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.
Ismat KhatriUniversity Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Anna PodnosUniversity Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Toronto General Hospital · CAAkdeniz University · TRUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe have compared cure from local/metastatic tumor growth in BALB/c mice receiving EMT6 or the poorly immunogenic, highly metastatic 4THM, breast cancer cells following manipulation of immunosuppressive CD200:CD200R interactions or conventional chemotherapy.

methodsWe reported previously that EMT6 tumors are cured in CD200R1KO mice following surgical resection and immunization with irradiated EMT6 cells and CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG), while wild-type (WT) animals developed pulmonary and liver metastases within 30 days of surgery. We report growth and metastasis of both EMT6 and a highly metastatic 4THM tumor in WT mice receiving iv infusions of Fab anti-CD200R1 along with CpG/tumor cell immunization. Metastasis was followed both macroscopically (lung/liver nodules) and microscopically by cloning tumor cells at limiting dilution in vitro from draining lymph nodes (DLN) harvested at surgery. We compared these results with local/metastatic tumor growth in mice receiving 4 courses of combination treatment with anti-VEGF and paclitaxel.

resultsIn WT mice receiving Fab anti-CD200R, no tumor cells are detectable following immunotherapy, and CD4+ cells produced increased TNFα/IL-2/IFNγ on stimulation with EMT6 in vitro. No long-term cure was seen following surgery/immunotherapy of 4THM, with both microscopic (tumors in DLN at limiting dilution) and macroscopic metastases present within 14 d of surgery. Chemotherapy attenuated growth/metastases in 4THM tumor-bearers and produced a decline in lung/liver metastases, with no detectable DLN metastases in EMT6 tumor-bearing mice-these latter mice nevertheless showed no significantly increased cytokine production after restimulation with EMT6 in vitro. EMT6 mice receiving immunotherapy were resistant to subsequent re-challenge with EMT6 tumor cells, but not those receiving curative chemotherapy. Anti-CD4 treatment caused tumor recurrence after immunotherapy, but produced no apparent effect in either EMT6 or 4THM tumor bearers after chemotherapy treatment.

conclusionImmunotherapy, but not chemotherapy, enhances CD4+ immunity and affords long-term control of breast cancer growth and resistance to new tumor foci.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAnimalsAntibodiesAntigens, CDAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBreast NeoplasmsCD4 AntigensCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsInterferon-gammaInterleukin-2Liver NeoplasmsAntibodiesAntigens, CDantigens, CD200Antineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCd200r1 protein, mouseCD4 AntigensCPG-oligonucleotideImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsInterferon-gammaInterleukin-2OligodeoxyribonucleotidesOrexin ReceptorsPaclitaxelTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID25409195
PMCPMC4237434
OpenAlexW1965640635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.