Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25409017›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The generation of successive unmarked mutations and chromosomal insertion of heterologous genes in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae using natural transformation.

Janine T Bossé, Denise M Soares-Bazzolli, Yanwen Li, Brendan W Wren, Alexander W Tucker, Duncan J Maskell, Andrew N Rycroft, Paul R Langford, BRaDP1T Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ISAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rationally designedAnimal diseases · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative Genomics ofInternational journal of genomics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Janine T BosséSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Denise M Soares-BazzolliSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom; Laboratório de Genética Molecular de Micro-organismos, Departamento de Microbiologia - DMB - BIOAGRO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa - Viçosa, Brazil.
Yanwen LiSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Brendan W WrenDepartment of Pathogen Molecular Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Alexander W TuckerDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Duncan J MaskellDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Andrew N RycroftDepartment of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, The Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Paul R LangfordSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
BRaDP1T Consortium

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G018553/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G019177/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G019274/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G020744/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K021109/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a simple method of generating scarless, unmarked mutations in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae by exploiting the ability of this bacterium to undergo natural transformation, and with no need to introduce plasmids encoding recombinases or resolvases. This method involves two successive rounds of natural transformation using linear DNA: the first introduces a cassette carrying cat (which allows selection by chloramphenicol) and sacB (which allows counter-selection using sucrose) flanked by sequences to either side of the target gene; the second transformation utilises the flanking sequences ligated directly to each other in order to remove the cat-sacB cassette. In order to ensure efficient uptake of the target DNA during transformation, A. pleuropneumoniae uptake sequences are added into the constructs used in both rounds of transformation. This method can be used to generate multiple successive deletions and can also be used to introduce targeted point mutations or insertions of heterologous genes into the A. pleuropneumoniae chromosome for development of live attenuated vaccine strains. So far, we have applied this method to highly transformable isolates of serovars 8 (MIDG2331), which is the most prevalent in the UK, and 15 (HS143). By screening clinical isolates of other serovars, it should be possible to identify other amenable strains.

Indexed as

Transformation, BacterialActinobacillus pleuropneumoniaeBacterial ProteinsChromosomes, BacterialEscherichia coliMutagenesis, InsertionalBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25409017
PMCPMC4237320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.