Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25408902›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular psychiatry2013

The amygdala between sensation and affect: a role in pain.

Pierre Veinante, Ipek Yalcin, Michel Barrot

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 164 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 303 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre VeinanteInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, UPR3212, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 21 Rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France ; Université de Strasbourg, 21 Rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Ipek YalcinInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, UPR3212, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 21 Rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France ; Université de Strasbourg, 21 Rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Michel BarrotInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, UPR3212, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 21 Rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France ; Université de Strasbourg, 21 Rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amygdala is a structure of the temporal lobe thought to be involved in assigning emotional significance to environmental information and triggering adapted physiological, behavioral and affective responses. A large body of literature in animals and human implicates the amygdala in fear. Pain having a strong affective and emotional dimension, the amygdala, especially its central nucleus (CeA), has also emerged in the last twenty years as key element of the pain matrix. The CeA receives multiple nociceptive information from the brainstem, as well as highly processed polymodal information from the thalamus and the cerebral cortex. It also possesses the connections that allow influencing most of the descending pain control systems as well as higher centers involved in emotional, affective and cognitive functions. Preclinical studies indicate that the integration of nociceptive inputs in the CeA only marginally contributes to sensory-discriminative components of pain, but rather contributes to associated behavior and affective responses. The CeA doesn't have a major influence on responses to acute nociception in basal condition, but it induces hypoalgesia during aversive situation, such as stress or fear. On the contrary, during persistent pain states (inflammatory, visceral, neuropathic), a long-lasting functional plasticity of CeA activity contributes to an enhancement of the pain experience, including hyperalgesia, aversive behavioral reactions and affective anxiety-like states.

Indexed as

Affective/emotional componentAmygdalaHyperalgesiaHypoalgesiaPersistent pain

Identifiers

PMID25408902
PMCPMC4223879
OpenAlexW2121366273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.