Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25408879›Full record

ReviewCell regeneration (London, England)2013

Defining synthetic surfaces for human pluripotent stem cell culture.

Jack W Lambshead, Laurence Meagher, Carmel O'Brien, Andrew L Laslett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell regeneration (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Engineered Human Stem Cell Microenvironments.Current stem cell reports · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Searching for naïve human pluripotent stem cells.World journal of stem cells · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jack W LambsheadCSIRO Materials Science and Engineering, Clayton, Victoria 3168 Australia ; Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Kragujevac, Victoria 3800 Australia.
Laurence MeagherCSIRO Materials Science and Engineering, Clayton, Victoria 3168 Australia.
Carmel O'BrienCSIRO Materials Science and Engineering, Clayton, Victoria 3168 Australia ; Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Kragujevac, Victoria 3800 Australia.
Andrew L LaslettCSIRO Materials Science and Engineering, Clayton, Victoria 3168 Australia ; Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Kragujevac, Victoria 3800 Australia ; Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3101 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are able to self-renew indefinitely and to differentiate into all adult cell types. hPSCs therefore show potential for application to drug screening, disease modelling and cellular therapies. In order to meet this potential, culture conditions must be developed that are consistent, defined, scalable, free of animal products and that facilitate stable self-renewal of hPSCs. Several culture surfaces have recently been reported to meet many of these criteria although none of them have been widely implemented by the stem cell community due to issues with validation, reliability and expense. Most hPSC culture surfaces have been derived from extracellular matrix proteins (ECMPs) and their cell adhesion molecule (CAM) binding motifs. Elucidating the CAM-mediated cell-surface interactions that are essential for the in vitro maintenance of pluripotency will facilitate the optimisation of hPSC culture surfaces. Reports indicate that hPSC cultures can be supported by cell-surface interactions through certain CAM subtypes but not by others. This review summarises the recent reports of defined surfaces for hPSC culture and focuses on the CAMs and ECMPs involved.

Indexed as

Cell adhesion moleculesHuman embryonic stem cellsInduced pluripotent stem cellsPluripotency

Identifiers

PMID25408879
PMCPMC4230363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.