Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25408642›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

The uncanny return of the race concept.

Andreas Heinz, Daniel J Müller, Sören Krach, Maurice Cabanis, Ulrike P Kluge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Taking Action on Racism and Structural Violence in Psychiatric Training and Clinical Practice.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Racism and mental health and the role of mental health professionals.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Racism and mental health].Der Nervenarzt · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas HeinzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-University Medicine Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Daniel J MüllerCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sören KrachDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Philipps-University Marburg Marburg, Germany.
Maurice CabanisCenter for Mental Health, Klinikum Stuttgart Stuttgart, Germany.
Ulrike P KlugeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-University Medicine Berlin Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this Hypothesis and Theory is to question the recently increasing use of the "race" concept in contemporary genetic, psychiatric, neuroscience as well as social studies. We discuss "race" and related terms used to assign individuals to distinct groups and caution that also concepts such as "ethnicity" or "culture" unduly neglect diversity. We suggest that one factor contributing to the dangerous nature of the "race" concept is that it is based on a mixture of traditional stereotypes about "physiognomy", which are deeply imbued by colonial traditions. Furthermore, the social impact of "race classifications" will be critically reflected. We then examine current ways to apply the term "culture" and caution that while originally derived from a fundamentally different background, "culture" is all too often used as a proxy for "race", particularly when referring to the population of a certain national state or wider region. When used in such contexts, suggesting that all inhabitants of a geographical or political unit belong to a certain "culture" tends to ignore diversity and to suggest a homogeneity, which consciously or unconsciously appears to extend into the realm of biological similarities and differences. Finally, we discuss alternative approaches and their respective relevance to biological and cultural studies.

Indexed as

cultural neuroscienceintelligence (IQ)psychiatryracial classificationracism

Identifiers

PMID25408642
PMCPMC4219449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.