ReviewJournal of psycholinguistic research2015
Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models.
Review in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Such sweet thunder.Second language research · 2025Article
- Automated Measures of Syntactic Complexity in Natural Speech Production: Older and Younger Adults as a Case Study.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Article
- Pupil Dilation Response to Prosody and Syntax During Auditory Sentence Processing.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2023Article
- Finding Hierarchical Structure in Binary Sequences: Evidence from Lindenmayer Grammar Learning.Cognitive science · 2023Article
- Parsers and Grammars: A Tutorial Overview from the Linguistics Building.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Similarity of computations across domains does not imply shared implementation: The case of language comprehension.Current directions in psychological science · 2021Article
- fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension.Neuropsychologia · 2020Article
- Gender Agreement Attraction in Greek Comprehension.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Article
- Processing Sentences With Multiple Negations: Grammatical Structures That Are Perceived as Unacceptable.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Asymmetries in the Acceptability and Felicity of English Negative Dependencies: Where Negative Concord and Negative Polarity (Do Not) Overlap.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Merging Generative Linguistics and Psycholinguistics.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- When Grammar and Parsing Agree.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Looking forwards and backwards: The real-time processing of Strong and Weak Crossover.Glossa (London) · 2017Article
- Relating (Un)acceptability to Interpretation. Experimental Investigations on Negation.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Backward Dependencies andFrontiers in psychology · 2017Review
- Addressee Identity and Morphosyntactic Processing in Basque Allocutive Agreement.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Is Passive Syntax Semantically Constrained? Evidence From Adult Grammaticality Judgment and Comprehension Studies.Cognitive science · 2016Article
- The dynamics of variation in individuals.Linguistic variation · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We address two important questions about the relationship between theoretical linguistics and psycholinguistics. First, do grammatical theories and language processing models describe separate cognitive systems, or are they accounts of different aspects of the same system? We argue that most evidence is consistent with the one-system view. Second, how should we relate grammatical theories and language processing models to each other?
Indexed as
Identifiers
25408514What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.