Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25408482›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2015

Outcome, complications, and mortality of an intrathoracic anastomosis in esophageal cancer in patients without a preoperative selection with a risk score.

Ingo Alldinger, Leila Sisic, Marcel Hochreiter, Wilko Weichert, Susanne Blank, Maria Burian, Lars Grenacher, Tom Bruckner, Jens Werner, Markus W Büchler and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ingo AlldingerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany, ingo.alldinger@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Leila Sisic
Marcel Hochreiter
Wilko Weichert
Susanne Blank
Maria Burian
Lars Grenacher
Tom Bruckner
Jens Werner
Markus W Büchler
Katja Ott
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEZimmer Biomet (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophagectomy for esophageal cancer remains a challenge with relatively high morbidity. We analyzed outcome, complications, and mortality after abdominothoracic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis. No routine preoperative risk stratification was performed.

methodsOne hundred eighty-seven consecutive patients (105 AEG I, 21 AEG II, 58 SCC, and 3 other entities) underwent standardized right abdominothoracic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis and two field lymphadenectomy between 2003 and 2009. Reconstruction was performed mostly with a gastric tube (n = 126) or a fundus rotation gastroplasty (n = 57). Seventy-four patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment (36 patients chemotherapy; 38 patients chemoradiotherapy).

resultsPostoperative morbidity was high (73.2 %). Ninety-two patients (49.2 %) suffered from surgical complications, 50 patients had major (26.7 %), and 42 minor (22.5 %) complications. Thirty-day mortality was 9/187 (4.8 %) while in-hospital mortality was doubled with 9.6 %. Six of 19 of the patients died without surgical complications. Preoperative treatment did not increase morbidity or mortality. Surgical complications with subsequent death were tracheobronchial fistula (2/3), ischemia of the gastric tube (3/6), anastomotic leakage (6/30), chylothorax (1/6), and intraoperative bleeding from the aorta (1/1). The median overall survival was 25.0 months. The occurrence of surgical or medical complications did not influence overall survival. In multivariate analysis, cT-category, pN-category, R-category, and re-intubation were independent prognostic factors.

conclusionsAbdominothoracic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis without preoperative patient selection is associated with a high risk for complications and subsequent death but ranges still within the upper range of published data. Strict patient selection is accepted to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality but excludes a subgroup of patients from potentially curative resection.

Indexed as

Esophagogastric JunctionAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalComorbidityEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMale

Identifiers

PMID25408482
OpenAlexW2004090604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.