ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2015
The radiologic technologists' health study in South Korea: study design and baseline results.
Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occupational radiation exposure and cause-specific mortality in a cohort of Canadian medical workers.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2026Article
- Circulatory disease mortality among male medical radiation workers in South Korea, 1996-2019.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2023Article
- Portrait of Filipino healthcare workers' discrimination experiences during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences · 2022Article
- Data integration of National Dose Registry and survey data using multivariate imputation by chained equations.PloS one · 2022Article
- A Cohort Study of Korean Radiation Workers: Baseline Characteristics of Participants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Thyroid cancer risks among medical radiation workers in South Korea, 1996-2015.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2019Article
- Projected lifetime cancer risks from occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic medical radiation workers in South Korea.BMC cancer · 2018Article
- ESTIMATION OF ORGAN DOSES AMONG DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL RADIATION WORKERS IN SOUTH KOREA.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Reconstruction of Radiation Dose Received by Diagnostic Radiologic Technologists in Korea.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2016Article
- Relating factors to wearing personal radiation protectors among healthcare professionals.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe the study design, methods, and baseline results of a prospective cohort of radiologic technologists which we have initiated in South Korea.
methodsThe cohort participants were enrolled through a self-administered questionnaire survey administered from April 2012 to May 2013. Survey data were linked with radiation dosimetry, a cancer registry, and health insurance data by personal identification numbers. A nationwide representative survey was also conducted using a stratified random sampling design with face-to-face interviews.
resultsA total of 12,387 radiologic technologists were enrolled, which accounted for approximately 63% of all diagnostic radiologic technologists working in South Korea. For nationwide survey, 585 workers were interviewed using the detailed questionnaire, and buccal cells were also collected by scraping the inside of the cheek. The majority of study subjects were under 50-year-old and male workers. The average annual effective dose of radiation declined both men (from 2.75 to 1.43 mSv) and women (from 1.34 to 0.95 mSv) over the period of 1996-2011. A total of 99 cancers (66 cancers in men and 33 in women) were reported from 1992 to 2010. The standardized incidence ratio of all cancer combined was significantly lower in men (SIR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.96) than general population, but the ratios for thyroid cancer were significantly higher than expected among both men and women.
conclusionsThis cohort provides comprehensive information on work activities and health status of diagnostic radiologic technologists. In addition, the nationwide representative sample provides unique opportunities compared with previous radiologic technologist studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25408461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.