Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25408234›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2014

OpenFLUX2: (13)C-MFA modeling software package adjusted for the comprehensive analysis of single and parallel labeling experiments.

Mikhail S Shupletsov, Lyubov I Golubeva, Svetlana S Rubina, Dmitry A Podvyaznikov, Shintaro Iwatani, Sergey V Mashko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. HMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. GC/MS-basedMicrobial cell factories · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. mfapy: An open-source Python package forMetabolic engineering communications · 2021
    Article
  17. High-resolutionNature protocols · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comprehensive assessment of measurement uncertainty inAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mikhail S ShupletsovAjinomoto-Genetika Research Institute, 117545, Moscow, Russian Federation. mikle.shupletsov@gmail.com.
Lyubov I GolubevaAjinomoto-Genetika Research Institute, 117545, Moscow, Russian Federation. luba_golubeva@agri.ru.
Svetlana S RubinaAjinomoto-Genetika Research Institute, 117545, Moscow, Russian Federation. sv.rubina@gmail.com.
Dmitry A PodvyaznikovAjinomoto-Genetika Research Institute, 117545, Moscow, Russian Federation. podviaznikoff@gmail.com.
Shintaro IwataniAjinomoto-Genetika Research Institute, 117545, Moscow, Russian Federation. shintaro_iwatani@ajinomoto.com.
Sergey V MashkoAjinomoto-Genetika Research Institute, 117545, Moscow, Russian Federation. sergey_mashko@agri.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSteady-state (13)C-based metabolic flux analysis ((13)C-MFA) is the most powerful method available for the quantification of intracellular fluxes. These analyses include concertedly linked experimental and computational stages: (i) assuming the metabolic model and optimizing the experimental design; (ii) feeding the investigated organism using a chosen (13)C-labeled substrate (tracer); (iii) measuring the extracellular effluxes and detecting the (13)C-patterns of intracellular metabolites; and (iv) computing flux parameters that minimize the differences between observed and simulated measurements, followed by evaluating flux statistics. In its early stages, (13)C-MFA was performed on the basis of data obtained in a single labeling experiment (SLE) followed by exploiting the developed high-performance computational software. Recently, the advantages of parallel labeling experiments (PLEs), where several LEs are conducted under the conditions differing only by the tracer(s) choice, were demonstrated, particularly with regard to improving flux precision due to the synergy of complementary information. The availability of an open-source software adjusted for PLE-based (13)C-MFA is an important factor for PLE implementation.

resultsThe open-source software OpenFLUX, initially developed for the analysis of SLEs, was extended for the computation of PLE data. Using the OpenFLUX2, in silico simulation confirmed that flux precision is improved when (13)C-MFA is implemented by fitting PLE data to the common model compared with SLE-based analysis. Efficient flux resolution could be achieved in the PLE-mediated analysis when the choice of tracer was based on an experimental design computed to minimize the flux variances from different parts of the metabolic network. The analysis provided by OpenFLUX2 mainly includes (i) the optimization of the experimental design, (ii) the computation of the flux parameters from LEs data, (iii) goodness-of-fit testing of the model's adequacy, (iv) drawing conclusions concerning the identifiability of fluxes and construction of a contribution matrix reflecting the relative contribution of the measurement variances to the flux variances, and (v) precise determination of flux confidence intervals using a fine-tunable and convergence-controlled Monte Carlo-based method.

conclusionsThe developed open-source OpenFLUX2 provides a friendly software environment that facilitates beginners and existing OpenFLUX users to implement LEs for steady-state (13)C-MFA including experimental design, quantitative evaluation of flux parameters and statistics.

Indexed as

Isotope LabelingSoftwareCarbon IsotopesCarbon Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID25408234
PMCPMC4263107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.