Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25408230›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Lessons learned from the clinical development of oral peptides.

Morten Asser Karsdal, Bente Juul Riis, Nozer Mehta, William Stern, Ehud Arbit, Claus Christiansen, Kim Henriksen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A review of lipidation in the development of advanced protein and peptide therapeutics.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Peptide Lipidation - A Synthetic Strategy to Afford Peptide Based Therapeutics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Morten Asser KarsdalNordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
Bente Juul Riis
Nozer Mehta
William Stern
Ehud Arbit
Claus Christiansen
Kim Henriksen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The oral delivery of peptides and proteins has been hampered by an array of obstacles. However, several promising novel oral delivery systems have been developed. This paper reviews the most advanced oral formulation technologies, and highlights key lessons and implications from studies undertaken to date with these oral formulations. Special interest is given to oral salmon calcitonin (CT), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), insulin, PYY-(3-36), recombinant human parathyroid hormone (rhPTH(1-31)-NH2) and PTH(1-34), by different technologies. The issues addressed include (i) interaction with water, (ii) interaction with food, (iii) diurnal variation, (iv) inter- and intra-subject variability, (v) correlation between efficacy and exposure and (vi) key deliverables of different technologies. These key lessons may aid research in the development of other oral formulations.

Indexed as

Administration, OralDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsGastrointestinal AbsorptionHumansPeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsTechnology, PharmaceuticalDrug CarriersPeptide FragmentsRecombinant Proteinsbonecalcitonincartilageclinical trialdiabetesoral formulation

Identifiers

PMID25408230
PMCPMC4415709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.