ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2015
ISAC's classification results file format.
Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CytoML for cross-platform cytometry data sharing.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2018Article
- Computational flow cytometry: helping to make sense of high-dimensional immunology data.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2016Review
- ISAC's Gating-ML 2.0 data exchange standard for gating description.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2015Article
- Methods for discovery and characterization of cell subsets in high dimensional mass cytometry data.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying homogenous sets of cell populations in flow cytometry is an important process for sorting and selecting populations of interests for further data acquisition and analysis. Many computational methods are now available to automate this process, with several algorithms partitioning cells based on high-dimensional separation versus the traditional pairwise two-dimensional visualization approach of manual gating. ISAC's classification results file format was developed to exchange the results of both manual gating and algorithmic classification approaches in a standardized way based on per event based classifications, including the potential for soft classifications expressed as the probability of an event being a member of a class. © 2014 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.