ReviewNeuroradiology2015
Scoring flow restoration in cerebral angiograms after endovascular revascularization in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Review in Neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis on outcome differences among patients with TICI2b versus TICI3 reperfusions: success revisited.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2018Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke of large-vessel occlusion beyond the time window based on imaging evaluation.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Article
- Impact of balloon guiding catheter in contact aspiration thrombectomy using large bore aspiration catheter for acute anterior circulation stroke patients: a case-control study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Cardiac Events After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Nation-Wide Cohort Study.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Safety of emergent carotid stenting after thrombolysis: a multicenter retrospective matched analysis.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Effects of Emergent Carotid Stenting Performed before or after Mechanical Thrombectomy in the Endovascular Management of Patients with Tandem Lesions: A Multicenter Retrospective Matched Analysis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Utility of AActa neurologica Belgica · 2024Article
- Benefits of First Pass Recanalization in Basilar Strokes Based on Initial Clinical Severity.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Observational
- Baseline clinical and neuroradiological predictors of outcome in patients with large ischemic core undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: A retrospective multicenter study.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024Article
- Location-specific ASPECTS does not improve Outcome Prediction in Large Vessel Occlusion compared to Cumulative ASPECTS.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Value of Thrombus Imaging Characteristics as a Guide for First-Line Endovascular Thrombectomy Device in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and low baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score: a multicenter retrospective matched analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Factors That Influence Susceptibility Vessel Sign in Patients With Acute Stroke Referred for Mechanical Thrombectomy.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Thrombus-associated microbiota in acute ischemic stroke patients.Surgical neurology international · 2022Article
- Effect of First-Pass Reperfusion on Outcome After Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic Stroke.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Observational
- Significant aortic stenosis associated with poorer functional outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020Article
- Absent filling of the superficial middle cerebral vein is associated with reperfusion but not parenchymal hematoma in stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy: an observational study.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch most likely to benefit from recanalization and good outcome after stroke.Medicine · 2020Observational
- Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018Article
- The Revascularization Scales Dilemma: Is It Right to Apply the Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia Scale in Posterior Circulation Stroke?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endovascular revascularization techniques are increasingly used to treat arterial occlusions in patients with acute ischemic stroke. To monitor and communicate treatment results, a valid, reproducible, and clinically relevant, yet easy to use grading scheme of arterial recanalization and tissue reperfusion for digital subtraction angiography is needed. An ideal scoring system would consider the target arterial lesion, the perfusion deficit, and the collateral status before treatment and measure recanalization, reperfusion, early venous shunting, vasospasm, as well as distal embolization after flow restoration. Currently, a variety of different flow restoration scales are in use, including the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction scoring system, the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score, and the Arterial Occlusive Lesion score, which describe the local recanalization result. These scores are not used homogeneously throughout the literature, are often modified and not fully documented, which make them inept to compare treatment effects across studies. In addition, none of these scores cover all of the above-mentioned aspects, nor are they able to describe satisfactorily all relevant angiographic findings, and data on their reliability and predictive power regarding clinical outcome are sparse. We aimed to review and illustrate the different revascularization scales, discuss their advantages and limitations as well as the available data regarding standardization, reliability testing, and outcome prediction. In addition, we give examples for the use of the scales and show potential pitfalls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25407716What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.