Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25407635›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2014

Extraction of venom and venom gland microdissections from spiders for proteomic and transcriptomic analyses.

Jessica E Garb

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. De Novo Transcriptome Analysis of the Venom ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Widow spiders in the New World: a review onThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Venomics: A Mini-Review.High-throughput · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica E GarbDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Jessica_Garb@uml.edu.
University of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Justin M Snider · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
SOUTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES CENTERP30ES006694 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Paloma Inés Beamer · 1994 to 2026
$36.7M
Discovering Biomedically Significant Spider Venom Toxins with GenomicsR15GM097714 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI GARB, JESSICA ELLEN · 2011 to 2015
$611k
Molecular evolution of latrotoxins: neurotoxins from black widow spider venomF32GM083661 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GARB, JESSICA · 2007 to 2009
$91k
NCI NIH HHS CA023074NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NIEHS NIH HHS ES06694NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006694NIGMS NIH HHS 1F32GM83661-01NIGMS NIH HHS 1R15GM097714-01NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM083661NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM097714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venoms are chemically complex secretions typically comprising numerous proteins and peptides with varied physiological activities. Functional characterization of venom proteins has important biomedical applications, including the identification of drug leads or probes for cellular receptors. Spiders are the most species rich clade of venomous organisms, but the venoms of only a few species are well-understood, in part due to the difficulty associated with collecting minute quantities of venom from small animals. This paper presents a protocol for the collection of venom from spiders using electrical stimulation, demonstrating the procedure on the Western black widow (Latrodectus hesperus). The collected venom is useful for varied downstream analyses including direct protein identification via mass spectrometry, functional assays, and stimulation of venom gene expression for transcriptomic studies. This technique has the advantage over protocols that isolate venom from whole gland homogenates, which do not separate genuine venom components from cellular proteins that are not secreted as part of the venom. Representative results demonstrate the detection of known venom peptides from the collected sample using mass spectrometry. The venom collection procedure is followed by a protocol for dissecting spider venom glands, with results demonstrating that this leads to the characterization of venom-expressed proteins and peptides at the sequence level.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBlack Widow SpiderElectric StimulationFemaleGene Expression ProfilingMass SpectrometryMicrodissectionMolecular Sequence DataProteomicsSpider VenomslatrodectinSpider Venoms

Identifiers

PMID25407635
PMCPMC4353418
OpenAlexW1981560924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.