ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2015
Detection of signals of abuse and dependence applying disproportionality analysis.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Associated With Cocaine Use Disorder: Results From the French Nationwide Repeated Cross-Sectional OPPIDUM Study (2019-2023).Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Psychoactive prescription drug use and misuse in patients on opioid agonist treatment.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Patterns of Pregabalin Users from Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities: Results from the French OPPIDUM Program from 2008 to 2022.CNS drugs · 2024Article
- Polydrug abuse among opioid maintenance treatment patients is related to inadequate dose of maintenance treatment medicine.BMC psychiatry · 2017Article
- Disproportionality Analysis for the Assessment of Abuse and Dependence Potential of Pregabalin in the French Pharmacovigilance Database.Clinical drug investigation · 2016Article
- From Clinical Application to Cognitive Enhancement: The Example of Methylphenidate.Current neuropharmacology · 2016Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrescription drug abuse and dependence is a widespread phenomenon in many countries. The use of disproportionality measures in drug abuse surveillance is rarely performed. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the occurrence of signals of abuse and dependence for different psychoactive drugs in real-life settings.
methodsDisproportionality analysis was realised from a database specifically constructed for the monitoring of drug abuse and dependence. This database provides information on approximately 5000 patients and 8000 consumption modalities for more than 100 distinct psychoactive medications for 2010 and 2011. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR) was computed in two population groups: subjects under an opiate maintenance treatment (OMT) versus those not under OMT, and focused on four types of behaviours: abuse and dependence, illegal acquisition, diverted route of administration and concomitant alcohol use.
resultsAmong the 100 psychoactive drugs for which a signal could be detected, those presenting the highest signals were the following: flunitrazepam, clonazepam, methylphenidate, ketamine, morphine sulfate, codeine and buprenorphine.
conclusionsThe present study shows an innovative application of disproportionality measures for drug abuse monitoring based on two cross-national, annual studies. The disproportionality analysis provided the opportunity to reveal and compare the magnitude of signals between 100 psychoactive drugs. This approach helps to compare the magnitude of abuse and dependence behaviours for a large number of drugs, and allows prioritizing actions in a context where such events are usually underreported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.