Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25407537›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome.

Beatrice Milon, Yezhou Sun, Weizhong Chang, Todd Creasy, Anup Mahurkar, Amol Shetty, Dmitry Nurminsky, Maria Nurminskaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beatrice Milon
Yezhou Sun
Weizhong Chang
Todd Creasy
Anup Mahurkar
Amol Shetty
Dmitry NurminskyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, 108 N, Greene St,, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. dnurminsky@som.umaryland.edu.
Maria Nurminskaya
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION IN DROSOPHILA SPERMATOGENESISR01GM061549 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI NURMINSKY, DMITRY I · 2000 to 2010
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM061549NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChromatin compactness has been considered a major determinant of gene activity and has been associated with specific chromatin modifications in studies on a few individual genetic loci. At the same time, genome-wide patterns of open and closed chromatin have been understudied, and are at present largely predicted from chromatin modification and gene expression data. However the universal applicability of such predictions is not self-evident, and requires experimental verification.

resultsWe developed and implemented a high-throughput analysis for general chromatin sensitivity to DNase I which provides a comprehensive epigenomic assessment in a single assay. Contiguous domains of open and closed chromatin were identified by computational analysis of the data, and correlated to other genome annotations including predicted chromatin "states", individual chromatin modifications, nuclear lamina interactions, and gene expression. While showing that the widely trusted predictions of chromatin structure are correct in the majority of cases, we detected diverse "exceptions" from the conventional rules. We found a profound paucity of chromatin modifications in a major fraction of closed chromatin, and identified a number of loci where chromatin configuration is opposite to that expected from modification and gene expression patterns. Further, we observed that chromatin of large introns tends to be closed even when the genes are expressed, and that a significant proportion of active genes including their promoters are located in closed chromatin.

conclusionsThese findings reveal limitations of the existing predictive models, indicate novel mechanisms of epigenetic regulation, and provide important insights into genome organization and function.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenome, InsectAnimalsBinding SitesChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyComputational BiologyDeoxyribonuclease IDrosophilaProtein BindingChromatinDeoxyribonuclease I

Identifiers

PMID25407537
PMCPMC4289254
OpenAlexW2008077261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.