ArticleBMC genomics2014
Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Argonaute proteins orchestrate Meiotic Sex Chromosome Inactivation and timing of the spermatogenic transcriptional program.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Novel principles of molecular genetic mapping of the interphase genome of Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Microbial communities experienced during early development shape the host immune system and epigenome.iScience · 2025Article
- Developmental and Housekeeping Genes: Two Types of Genetic Organization in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Neutral Models of De Novo Gene Emergence Suggest that Gene Evolution has a Preferred Trajectory.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Discrete cis-acting element regulates developmentally timed gene-lamina relocation and neural progenitor competence in vivo.Developmental cell · 2021Article
- Nucleosome Positioning around Transcription Start Site Correlates with Gene Expression Only for Active Chromatin State in Drosophila Interphase Chromosomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Reorganization of the nuclear architecture in theNucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2020Article
- Article
- Faint gray bands in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes are formed by coding sequences of housekeeping genes.Chromosoma · 2020Article
- Molecular and genetic organization of bands and interbands in the dot chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster.Chromosoma · 2019Article
- Nuclear lamina integrity is required for proper spatial organization of chromatin in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Polytene Chromosomes - A Portrait of Functional Organization of theCurrent genomics · 2018Review
- Border Structure of Intercalary Heterochromatin Bands of Drosophila melanogaster Polytene Chromosomes.Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics · 2018Article
- Similarity in replication timing between polytene and diploid cells is associated with the organization of the Drosophila genome.PloS one · 2018Article
- Article
- 3D genomics imposes evolution of the domain model of eukaryotic genome organization.Chromosoma · 2017Review
- Coming to terms with chromatin structure.Chromosoma · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChromatin compactness has been considered a major determinant of gene activity and has been associated with specific chromatin modifications in studies on a few individual genetic loci. At the same time, genome-wide patterns of open and closed chromatin have been understudied, and are at present largely predicted from chromatin modification and gene expression data. However the universal applicability of such predictions is not self-evident, and requires experimental verification.
resultsWe developed and implemented a high-throughput analysis for general chromatin sensitivity to DNase I which provides a comprehensive epigenomic assessment in a single assay. Contiguous domains of open and closed chromatin were identified by computational analysis of the data, and correlated to other genome annotations including predicted chromatin "states", individual chromatin modifications, nuclear lamina interactions, and gene expression. While showing that the widely trusted predictions of chromatin structure are correct in the majority of cases, we detected diverse "exceptions" from the conventional rules. We found a profound paucity of chromatin modifications in a major fraction of closed chromatin, and identified a number of loci where chromatin configuration is opposite to that expected from modification and gene expression patterns. Further, we observed that chromatin of large introns tends to be closed even when the genes are expressed, and that a significant proportion of active genes including their promoters are located in closed chromatin.
conclusionsThese findings reveal limitations of the existing predictive models, indicate novel mechanisms of epigenetic regulation, and provide important insights into genome organization and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.