Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25407007›Full record

Trial reportBMC emergency medicine2014

Effectiveness of physical exam signs for early detection of critical illness in pediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Halden F Scott, Aaron J Donoghue, David F Gaieski, Ronald F Marchese, Rakesh D Mistry

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC emergency medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Methylene Blue for Refractory Shock in Children: A Systematic Review and Survey Practice Analysis.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Critical Assessment of Time-to-Antibiotics Recommendations in Pediatric Sepsis.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2024
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Halden F ScottSection of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 East 16th Avenue, B251, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Halden.scott@childrenscolorado.org.
Aaron J Donoghue
David F Gaieski
Ronald F Marchese
Rakesh D Mistry
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection of compensated pediatric septic shock requires diagnostic tests that are sensitive and specific. Four physical exam signs are recommended for detecting pediatric septic shock prior to hypotension (cold extremities, mental status, capillary refill, peripheral pulse quality); this study tested their ability to detect patients who develop organ dysfunction among a cohort of undifferentiated pediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients.

methodsA prospective cohort of 239 pediatric emergency department patients <19 years with fever and tachycardia and undergoing phlebotomy were enrolled. Physicians recorded initial physical exams on a standardized form. Abstraction of the medical record determined outcomes including organ dysfunction, intensive care unit stay, serious bacterial infection, and therapies.

resultsOrgan dysfunction occurred in 13/239 (5.4%) patients. Presence of at least one sign was significantly associated with organ dysfunction (Relative Risk: 2.71, 95% CI: 1.05-6.99), and presence of at least two signs had a Relative Risk = 4.98 (95% CI: 1.82-13.58). The sensitivity of exam findings ranged from 8-54%, specificity from 84-98%. Signs were associated with increased risk of intensive care and fluid bolus, but not with serious bacterial infection, intravenous antibiotics or admission. Altered mental status and peripheral pulse quality were significantly associated with organ dysfunction, while abnormal capillary refill time and presence of cold, mottled extremities were not.

conclusionsCertain recommended physical exam signs were associated with increased risk of organ dysfunction, a rare outcome in this undifferentiated pediatric population with fever and tachycardia. Sensitivity was low, while specificity was high. Additional research into optimally sensitive and specific diagnostic strategies is needed.

Indexed as

Physical ExaminationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCritical IllnessEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMaleMultiple Organ FailureProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityShock, Septic

Identifiers

PMID25407007
PMCPMC4289256
OpenAlexW1999927127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.