Development and future directions for the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS estimates.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Updated Data and Methods for the 2023 UNAIDS HIV Estimates.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2024
   Article
2. HIV estimates through 2018: data for decision-making.AIDS (London, England) · 2019
   Article
3. Implementing Tuberculosis Close-contact Investigation in a Tertiary Hospital in Iran.International journal of preventive medicine · 2018
   Article
4. Statistical models for incorporating data from routine HIV testing of pregnant women at antenatal clinics into HIV/AIDS epidemic estimates.AIDS (London, England) · 2017
   Article
5. Migration, sexual behaviour, and HIV risk: a general population cohort in rural South Africa.The lancet. HIV · 2015
   Article
6. Producing HIV estimates: from global advocacy to country planning and impact measurement.Global health action
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as