Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25406409›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2015

Diagnostic accuracy of SeptiFast multi-pathogen real-time PCR in the setting of suspected healthcare-associated bloodstream infection.

Geoffrey Warhurst, Satanayarana Maddi, Graham Dunn, Murad Ghrew, Paul Chadwick, Peter Alexander, Andrew Bentley, John Moore, Michael Sharman, Gordon L Carlson and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Causes of fever in primary care in Southeast Asia and the performance of C-reactive protein in discriminating bacterial from viral pathogens.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Validation of an Isothermal Amplification Platform for Microbial Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance Detection in Blood: A Prospective Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Focus on severe infections.Intensive care medicine · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Geoffrey WarhurstInfection, Injury and Inflammation Research Group, Biomedical Facility, Clinical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 8HD, UK.
Satanayarana Maddi
Graham Dunn
Murad Ghrew
Paul Chadwick
Peter Alexander
Andrew Bentley
John Moore
Michael Sharman
Gordon L Carlson
Duncan Young
Paul Dark
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health 08/13/16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeptiFast is a real-time PCR assay which targets ribosomal DNA sequences of bacteria and fungi, enabling detection and identification of the commonest pathogens in blood within a few hours, including those acquired in healthcare settings. We report here the first detailed assessment of SeptiFast that focuses on healthcare-associated bloodstream infections which develop during routine critical care.

methodsThis was a prospective multicentre study designed to compare the clinical diagnostic accuracy of SeptiFast versus microbiological culture and independent clinical adjudication. This Phase III diagnostic study was performed in an adequately sized cohort of adult patients who developed new signs of suspected bloodstream infection while receiving routine critical care.

resultsOf 1,006 new episodes of suspected bloodstream infection in 853 patients, 922 (92 %) of these episodes in 795 patients met the inclusion criteria of the study. Patients had been exposed to a median of 8 days (interquartile range 4-16) of hospital care and had received high levels of organ support and recent antibiotic exposure. The SeptiFast test, when compared with bloodstream infection at the species/genus level, had a greater specificity [0.86, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.83-0.88] than sensitivity (0.50, 95 % CI 0.39-0.61). There was a low prevalence of blood culture-proven pathogens (9.2 %, 95 % CI 7.4-11.2 %), and the post-test probabilities of both a positive (26.3 %, 95 % CI 19.8-33.7 %) and a negative SeptiFast test (5.6 %, 95 % CI 4.1-7.4 %) indicated potential limitations of this technology in diagnosing bloodstream infection.

conclusionWhen compared with blood culture, SeptiFast is likely to have limited utility for the diagnosis of healthcare-associated bloodstream infection in critical care patients despite its potential to deliver results more rapidly.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBacteremiaCritical CareCross InfectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID25406409
OpenAlexW2064256837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.