Trial reportCirculation. Cardiovascular genetics2015
Targeted deep sequencing reveals no definitive evidence for somatic mosaicism in atrial fibrillation.
Trial report in Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06976502 (Health eHeart BioBank), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Health eHeart BioBank
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atrial fibrillation: pathophysiology, genetic and epigenetic mechanisms.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Review
- Somatic Mutations in Cardiovascular Disease.Circulation research · 2022Review
- Analysis of somatic mutations identifies signs of selection during in vitro aging of primary dermal fibroblasts.Aging cell · 2019Article
- Therapeutic strategies targeting connexins.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2018Review
- Germline versus somatic mutations in genetic atrial fibrillation.Heart rhythm · 2017Article
- Genetics of atrial fibrillation: from families to genomes.Journal of human genetics · 2016Review
- The Role of Pharmacogenetics in Atrial Fibrillation Therapeutics: Is Personalized Therapy in Sight?Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2016Review
- Somatic mutations and atrial fibrillation: the end or just the beginning?Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies of ≤15 atrial fibrillation (AF) patients have identified atrial-specific mutations within connexin genes, suggesting that somatic mutations may account for sporadic cases of the arrhythmia. We sought to identify atrial somatic mutations among patients with and without AF using targeted deep next-generation sequencing of 560 genes, including genetic culprits implicated in AF, the Mendelian cardiomyopathies and channelopathies, and all ion channels within the genome. METHODS AND
resultsTargeted gene capture and next-generation sequencing were performed on DNA from lymphocytes and left atrial appendages of 34 patients (25 with AF). Twenty AF patients had undergone cardiac surgery exclusively for pulmonary vein isolation and 17 had no structural heart disease. Sequence alignment and variant calling were performed for each atrial-lymphocyte pair using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner, the Genome Analysis Toolkit, and MuTect packages. Next-generation sequencing yielded a median 265-fold coverage depth (interquartile range, 64-369). Comparison of the 3 million base pairs from each atrial-lymphocyte pair revealed a single potential somatic missense mutation in 3 AF patients and 2 in a single control (12 versus 11%; P=1). All potential discordant variants had low allelic fractions (range, 2.3%-7.3%) and none were detected with conventional sequencing.
conclusionsUsing high-depth next-generation sequencing and state-of-the art somatic mutation calling approaches, no pathogenic atrial somatic mutations could be confirmed among 25 AF patients in a comprehensive cardiac arrhythmia genetic panel. These findings indicate that atrial-specific mutations are rare and that somatic mosaicism is unlikely to exert a prominent role in AF pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.