ArticleStroke2015
Improving outcomes in patients with carotid stenosis: call for better research opportunities and standards.
Article in Stroke, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extra-Cranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Objective Analysis of the Available Evidence.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- The Differentiation in Image Post-processing and 3D Reconstruction During Evaluation of Carotid Plaques From MR and CT Data Sources.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Frailty as measured by the Risk Analysis Index is associated with long-term death after carotid endarterectomy.Journal of vascular surgery · 2020Article
- Ultrasound-based carotid stenosis measurement and risk stratification in diabetic cohort: a deep learning paradigm.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2019Article
- Predictive Value of Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Assessment in Surgical Management of Patients with High-Grade Carotid Artery Stenosis.Frontiers in physiology · 2017Article
- Detection of Symptomatic Carotid Plaque Using Source Data from MR and CT Angiography: A Correlative Study.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25406149What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.