Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25405973›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

Potential ecological footprints of active pharmaceutical ingredients: an examination of risk factors in low-, middle- and high-income countries.

Rai S Kookana, Mike Williams, Alistair B A Boxall, D G Joakim Larsson, Sally Gaw, Kyungho Choi, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Shashidhar Thatikonda, Yong-Guan Zhu, Pedro Carriquiriborde

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Inhibition of Fin Regeneration in Fathead Minnow (Environmental science & technology · 2025
    Article
  4. The Potential Role of Ecotoxicological Data in National Essential Medicine Lists: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Antibiotic resistance in the environment.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Pharmaceutical pollution of the world's rivers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sustainable waste management of medical waste in African developing countries: A narrative review.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.

Rai S KookanaCSIRO, Private Mail Bag No 2, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia rai.kookana@csiro.au.
Mike WilliamsCSIRO, Private Mail Bag No 2, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia.
Alistair B A BoxallEnvironment Department, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
D G Joakim LarssonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Institute for Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sally GawDepartment of Chemistry, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
Kyungho ChoiSchool of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hiroshi YamamotoFaculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokushima, Tokushima 770-8502, Japan.
Shashidhar ThatikondaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, India.
Yong-Guan ZhuGeneral Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1799 Jimei Road, Xiamen 361021, People's Republic of China.
Pedro CarriquiribordeCentro de Investigaciones del Medio Ambiente Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de la Plata Calle, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUChinese Academy of Sciences · CNIndian Institute of Technology Hyderabad · INSeoul National University · KRTokushima University · JPUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · ARUniversity of Canterbury · NZUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) can enter the natural environment during manufacture, use and/or disposal, and consequently public concern about their potential adverse impacts in the environment is growing. Despite the bulk of the human population living in Asia and Africa (mostly in low- or middle-income countries), limited work relating to research, development and regulations on APIs in the environment have so far been conducted in these regions. Also, the API manufacturing sector is gradually shifting to countries with lower production costs. This paper focuses mainly on APIs for human consumption and highlights key differences between the low-, middle- and high-income countries, covering factors such as population and demographics, manufacture, prescriptions, treatment, disposal and reuse of waste and wastewater. The striking differences in populations (both human and animal), urbanization, sewer connectivity and other factors have revealed that the environmental compartments receiving the bulk of API residues differ markedly between low- and high-income countries. High sewer connectivity in developed countries allows capture and treatment of the waste stream (point-source). However, in many low- or middle-income countries, sewerage connectivity is generally low and in some areas waste is collected predominantly in septic systems. Consequently, the diffuse-source impact, such as on groundwater from leaking septic systems or on land due to disposal of raw sewage or septage, may be of greater concern. A screening level assessment of potential burdens of APIs in urban and rural environments of countries representing low- and middle-income as well as high-income has been made. Implications for ecological risks of APIs used by humans in lower income countries are discussed.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesDeveloping CountriesEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsPharmaceutical PreparationsRisk FactorsEnvironmental PollutantsPharmaceutical Preparationsantibioticsdeveloping countriesecological riskssewagewastewater

Identifiers

PMID25405973
PMCPMC4213596
OpenAlexW1978197281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.