Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25405968›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

Ecological effects of pharmaceuticals in aquatic systems--impacts through behavioural alterations.

Tomas Brodin, Susanna Piovano, Jerker Fick, Jonatan Klaminder, Martina Heynen, Micael Jonsson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 490 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Z-Drugs in the Environment: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ecotoxicity of Fire Retardants to Zebrafish (Journal of xenobiotics · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Tomas BrodinDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden tomas.brodin@emg.umu.se.
Susanna PiovanoSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, The University of the South Pacific, Fiji Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Jerker FickDepartment of Chemistry, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.
Jonatan KlaminderDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.
Martina HeynenDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.
Micael JonssonDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SEUniversity of the South Pacific · FJ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of animal behaviour is important for both ecology and ecotoxicology, yet research in these two fields is currently developing independently. Here, we synthesize the available knowledge on drug-induced behavioural alterations in fish, discuss potential ecological consequences and report results from an experiment in which we quantify both uptake and behavioural impact of a psychiatric drug on a predatory fish (Perca fluviatilis) and its invertebrate prey (Coenagrion hastulatum). We show that perch became more active while damselfly behaviour was unaffected, illustrating that behavioural effects of pharmaceuticals can differ between species. Furthermore, we demonstrate that prey consumption can be an important exposure route as on average 46% of the pharmaceutical in ingested prey accumulated in the predator. This suggests that investigations of exposure through bioconcentration, where trophic interactions and subsequent bioaccumulation of exposed individuals are ignored, underestimate exposure. Wildlife may therefore be exposed to higher levels of behaviourally altering pharmaceuticals than predictions based on commonly used exposure assays and pharmaceutical concentrations found in environmental monitoring programmes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Anxiety AgentsOdonataOxazepamPerchesPredatory BehaviorWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnti-Anxiety AgentsOxazepamWater Pollutants, Chemicalbehaviourbenzodiazepinesbioconcentrationcontaminantsecological effectsPerca fluviatilis

Identifiers

PMID25405968
PMCPMC4213591
OpenAlexW2154472922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.