Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25405966›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

Risks of hormonally active pharmaceuticals to amphibians: a growing concern regarding progestagens.

Moa Säfholm, Anton Ribbenstedt, Jerker Fick, Cecilia Berg

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Use of Zebrafish in Drug Discovery Toxicology.Chemical research in toxicology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Unexpected metabolic disorders induced by endocrine disruptors inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Ecological effects of pharmaceuticals in aquatic systems--impacts through behavioural alterations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
  10. Potential ecological footprints of active pharmaceutical ingredients: an examination of risk factors in low-, middle- and high-income countries.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
  11. Medicating the environment: assessing risks of pharmaceuticals to wildlife and ecosystems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
  12. Application of in silico and in vitro methods in the development of adverse outcome pathway constructs in wildlife.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Moa SäfholmDepartment of Organismal Biology, Environmental Toxicology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18A, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden.
Anton RibbenstedtDepartment of Organismal Biology, Environmental Toxicology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18A, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden.
Jerker FickDepartment of Chemistry, Umeå University, KBC 6A, Linnaeus väg 6, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.
Cecilia BergDepartment of Organismal Biology, Environmental Toxicology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18A, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden cecilia.berg@ebc.uu.se.
Uppsala University · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most amphibians breed in water, including the terrestrial species, and may therefore be exposed to water-borne pharmaceuticals during critical phases of the reproductive cycle, i.e. sex differentiation and gamete maturation. The objectives of this paper were to (i) review available literature regarding adverse effects of hormonally active pharmaceuticals on amphibians, with special reference to environmentally relevant exposure levels and (ii) expand the knowledge on toxicity of progestagens in amphibians by determining effects of norethindrone (NET) and progesterone (P) exposure to 0, 1, 10 or 100 ng l(-1) (nominal) on oogenesis in the test species Xenopus tropicalis. Very little information was found on toxicity of environmentally relevant concentrations of pharmaceuticals on amphibians. Research has shown that environmental concentrations (1.8 ng l(-1)) of the pharmaceutical oestrogen ethinylestradiol (EE2) cause developmental reproductive toxicity involving impaired spermatogenesis in frogs. Recently, it was found that the progestagen levonorgestrel (LNG) inhibited oogenesis in frogs by interrupting the formation of vitellogenic oocytes at an environmentally relevant concentration (1.3 ng l(-1)). Results from the present study revealed that 1 ng NET l(-1) and 10 ng P l(-1) caused reduced proportions of vitellogenic oocytes and increased proportions of previtellogenic oocytes compared with the controls, thereby indicating inhibited vitellogenesis. Hence, the available literature shows that the oestrogen EE2 and the progestagens LNG, NET and P impair reproductive functions in amphibians at environmentally relevant exposure concentrations. The progestagens are of particular concern given their prevalence, the range of compounds and that several of them (LNG, NET and P) share the same target (oogenesis) at environmental exposure concentrations, indicating a risk for adverse effects on fertility in exposed wild amphibians.

Indexed as

AmphibiansAnimalsEstrogensProgestinsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsWater Pollutants, ChemicalEstrogensProgestinsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsWater Pollutants, Chemicalendocrine disruptionfertilityoogenesis

Identifiers

PMID25405966
PMCPMC4213589
OpenAlexW2166084060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.