Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25405964›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

Behavioural and physiological responses of birds to environmentally relevant concentrations of an antidepressant.

Tom G Bean, Alistair B A Boxall, Julie Lane, Katherine A Herborn, Stéphane Pietravalle, Kathryn E Arnold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Antidepressants surveillance in wastewater: Overview extraction and detection.Case studies in chemical and environmental engineering · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Bats from the Northeastern United States.Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology · 2015
    Article
  10. Medicating the environment: assessing risks of pharmaceuticals to wildlife and ecosystems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
  11. Potential ecological footprints of active pharmaceutical ingredients: an examination of risk factors in low-, middle- and high-income countries.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tom G BeanEnvironment Department, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Alistair B A BoxallEnvironment Department, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Julie LaneNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, York YO41 1LZ, UK.
Katherine A HerbornInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Stéphane PietravalleFood and Environment Research Agency, York YO41 1LZ, UK.
Kathryn E ArnoldEnvironment Department, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK kathryn.arnold@york.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many wildlife species forage on sewage-contaminated food, for example, at wastewater treatment plants and on fields fertilized with sewage sludge. The resultant exposure to human pharmaceuticals remains poorly studied for terrestrial species. On the basis of predicted exposure levels in the wild, we administered the common antidepressant fluoxetine (FLUOX) or control treatment via prey to wild-caught starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) for 22 weeks over winter. To investigate responses to fluoxetine, birds were moved from their group aviaries into individual cages for 2 days. Boldness, exploration and activity levels showed no treatment effects but controls and FLUOX birds habituated differently to isolation in terms of the concentration of corticosterone (CORT) metabolites in faeces. The controls that excreted higher concentrations of CORT metabolites on day 1 lost more body mass by day 2 of isolation than those which excreted lower levels of CORT metabolites. CORT metabolites and mass loss were unrelated in FLUOX birds. When we investigated the movements of birds in their group aviaries, we found the controls made a higher frequency of visits to food trays than FLUOX birds around the important foraging periods of sunrise and sunset, as is optimal for wintering birds. Although individual variability makes interpreting the sub-lethal endpoints measured challenging, our data suggest that fluoxetine at environmentally relevant concentrations can significantly alter behaviour and physiology.

Indexed as

StarlingsAnimalsAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationBehavior, AnimalCircadian RhythmCorticosteroneFecesFemaleFluoxetineMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationCorticosteroneFluoxetinecorticosteronefluoxetineforaging behaviourpersonality traitsProzac

Identifiers

PMID25405964
PMCPMC4213587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.