ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2015
Urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer.
Review in Current opinion in urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of novel urinary biomarker tests in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Real-world monitoring strategies and predictors guiding the transition from active surveillance to treatment in ISUP 1 prostate cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Targeted prostate cancer screening using polygenic risk scores: lessons from the BARCODE1 trial.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Article
- Unveiling the Dichotomy of Urinary Proteins: Diagnostic Insights into Breast and Prostate Cancer and Their Roles.Proteomes · 2023Review
- Current advances of liquid biopsies in prostate cancer: Molecular biomarkers.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2023Review
- Identification of hub genes in bladder cancer based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis from TCGA database.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Knockdown of CDCA8 inhibits the proliferation and enhances the apoptosis of bladder cancer cells.PeerJ · 2020Article
- Pre-Analytical Handling Conditions and Small RNA Recovery from Urine for miRNA Profiling.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2018Article
- Racial Variation in the Utility of Urinary Biomarkers PCA3 and T2ERG in a Large Multicenter Study.The Journal of urology · 2017Article
- Novel biomarkers for the detection of prostate cancer.Journal of clinical urology · 2016Article
- Editorial: Prostate Cancer: What We Know and What We Would Like to Know.Frontiers in oncology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe field of urology has been beset by several major trends that have affected the early detection of prostate cancer. These stem primarily from a backlash against overdiagnosis due to prostate specific antigen-based screening efforts and are epitomized by the US Preventive Services Task Force giving prostate specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening a 'D' recommendation. Consequently, the active surveillance strategy for low-risk prostate cancer has become commonplace, leading many to ask how best to follow these patients. More importantly, this public outcry has shifted the focus of early detection from an effort to diagnose any and all prostate cancers to an effort to diagnose only 'high-risk' cancer. Along with a trend for minimally invasive procedures, these forces have challenged the early detection field to more efficiently identify clinically significant prostate cancers at an early stage while limiting the number of biopsies. RECENT
findingsWith US Food and Drug Administration approval, prostate cancer antigen 3 has emerged as the first bona-fide urinary biomarker for prostate cancer. Using the same platform, investigators have developed a second urinary test based on TMPRSS2:erg fusion. Recent literature supports the use of these biomarkers as a combined panel that improves risk evaluation in the setting of prostate cancer detection. Early works for applying urinary biomarkers for active surveillance are underway. Other biomarkers in the pipeline will require further prevalidation and validation work. SUMMARY: Recent literature would support that urinary biomarkers have a clear role to supplement risk evaluation for men undergoing prostate biopsy and for prognostication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.