Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25405933›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2015

Urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer.

John T Wei

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

John T WeiUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

VACCINIA PSA FOR ANDROGEN-MODULATED POST-SURGICAL RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCERP50CA069568 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COONEY, KATHLEEN A · 1995 to 2013
$31.3M
Tissue/InformaticsP50CA186786 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Robert Timothy Dess · 2014 to 2026
$27.6M
Prostate Cancer Biomarker and Imaging Validation Alliance: Emory University, University of Alabama Birmingham, and University of Texas SouthwesternU01CA113913 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Martin G. Sanda · 2005 to 2026
$16.4M
Epitomic Biomarkers of Prostate CancerU01CA111275 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHINNAIYAN, ARUL M, RUBIN, MARK A. · 2004 to 2015
$6.8M
Molecuar Sub-typing of Prostate Cancer Based on Recurrent Gene FusionsR01CA132874 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHINNAIYAN, ARUL M · 2009 to 2013
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA069568NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186786NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132874NCI NIH HHS U01 CA111275NCI NIH HHS U01 CA113913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe field of urology has been beset by several major trends that have affected the early detection of prostate cancer. These stem primarily from a backlash against overdiagnosis due to prostate specific antigen-based screening efforts and are epitomized by the US Preventive Services Task Force giving prostate specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening a 'D' recommendation. Consequently, the active surveillance strategy for low-risk prostate cancer has become commonplace, leading many to ask how best to follow these patients. More importantly, this public outcry has shifted the focus of early detection from an effort to diagnose any and all prostate cancers to an effort to diagnose only 'high-risk' cancer. Along with a trend for minimally invasive procedures, these forces have challenged the early detection field to more efficiently identify clinically significant prostate cancers at an early stage while limiting the number of biopsies. RECENT

findingsWith US Food and Drug Administration approval, prostate cancer antigen 3 has emerged as the first bona-fide urinary biomarker for prostate cancer. Using the same platform, investigators have developed a second urinary test based on TMPRSS2:erg fusion. Recent literature supports the use of these biomarkers as a combined panel that improves risk evaluation in the setting of prostate cancer detection. Early works for applying urinary biomarkers for active surveillance are underway. Other biomarkers in the pipeline will require further prevalidation and validation work. SUMMARY: Recent literature would support that urinary biomarkers have a clear role to supplement risk evaluation for men undergoing prostate biopsy and for prognostication.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorHumansMaleOncogene FusionProstatic NeoplasmsSerine EndopeptidasesTrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional Regulator ERGAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorERG protein, humanprostate cancer antigen 3, humanSerine EndopeptidasesTMPRSS2 protein, humanTrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional Regulator ERG

Identifiers

PMID25405933
PMCPMC4270695
OpenAlexW2064891353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.