Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25405185›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2014

Evolution of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.

Colin J Przybylowski, Dale Ding, Robert M Starke, Christopher R Durst, R Webster Crowley, Kenneth C Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Neural regeneration research · 2017
    Article
  9. Manual thromboaspiration technique as a first approach for endovascular stroke treatment: A single-center experience.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Colin J PrzybylowskiColin J Przybylowski, Dale Ding, Robert M Starke, R Webster Crowley, Kenneth C Liu, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Dale DingColin J Przybylowski, Dale Ding, Robert M Starke, R Webster Crowley, Kenneth C Liu, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Robert M StarkeColin J Przybylowski, Dale Ding, Robert M Starke, R Webster Crowley, Kenneth C Liu, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Christopher R DurstColin J Przybylowski, Dale Ding, Robert M Starke, R Webster Crowley, Kenneth C Liu, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
R Webster CrowleyColin J Przybylowski, Dale Ding, Robert M Starke, R Webster Crowley, Kenneth C Liu, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Kenneth C LiuColin J Przybylowski, Dale Ding, Robert M Starke, R Webster Crowley, Kenneth C Liu, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a common medical problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. A small proportion of AIS patients meet eligibility criteria for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, and its efficacy for large vessel occlusion is poor. Therefore, an increasing number of patients with AIS are being treated with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy when IVT is ineffective or contraindicated. Rapid advancement in catheter-based and endovascular device technology has led to significant improvements in rates of cerebral reperfusion with these devices. Stentrievers and modern aspiration catheters have now surpassed earlier generation devices in the degree and rapidity of revascularization. This progress has been achieved with no concurrent increase in risk of major complications or mortality, both when used alone or in combination with IVT. The initial randomized controlled trials comparing endovascular therapy to IVT for AIS failed to show superior outcomes with endovascular treatment, but key limitations of each trial may limit the significance of these results to current practice. While endovascular devices and operator experience continue to evolve, we are optimistic that this will be accompanied by improvements in patient outcomes. This review highlights the major endovascular devices used in current practice and the trials which have investigated their efficacy.

Indexed as

Cerebral infarctionEndovascular proceduresIntracranial hemorrhagesStentsStroke

Identifiers

PMID25405185
PMCPMC4233417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.