Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25405184›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2014

Important of case-reports/series, in rare diseases: Using neuroendocrine tumors as an example.

Taichi Nakamura, Hisato Igarashi, Tetsuhide Ito, Robert T Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Laryngeal features in Lipoid proteinosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Dental Implants in People with Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Co-Occurrence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. THE VALUE OF N-OF-1 DATA IN ZOOLOGICAL MEDICINE: A METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW.Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. A literature review to understand the burden of disease in people living with tumour-induced osteomalacia.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taichi NakamuraTaichi Nakamura, Robert T Jensen, Cell Biology Section, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, MD 20814, United States.
Hisato IgarashiTaichi Nakamura, Robert T Jensen, Cell Biology Section, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, MD 20814, United States.
Tetsuhide ItoTaichi Nakamura, Robert T Jensen, Cell Biology Section, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, MD 20814, United States.
Robert T JensenTaichi Nakamura, Robert T Jensen, Cell Biology Section, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, MD 20814, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present the publishing of case reports or case series involving small numbers of cases is controversial. While in the past they were commonly published by most journals, recently a number of prominent journals have either stopped publishing them or markedly reduced the numbers published. However, recently an increasing case is being made for their value and a number of new journals have been started devoted specifically to their publication. One of the arguments used for their value is their prominent role in rare diseases either in their recognition, full description or development of treatments. However this aspect has not been specifically studied. In this editorial this aspect is specifically examined using their role in neuroendocrine tumors as an example. Furthermore, the background of the controversy is briefly reviewed to better understand the context of this editorial.

Indexed as

CarcinoidsCase reportCase seriesNeuroendocrine tumorsPancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

Identifiers

PMID25405184
PMCPMC4233424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.