Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25405089›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of orthopedics2014

Flap reconstruction of the knee: A review of current concepts and a proposed algorithm.

Andreas Gravvanis, Antonios Kyriakopoulos, Konstantinos Kateros, Dimosthenis Tsoutsos

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of orthopedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Utilization of the gastrocnemius flap for post-traumatic knee reconstruction: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas GravvanisAndreas Gravvanis, Antonios Kyriakopoulos, Dimosthenis Tsoutsos, Department of Plastic Surgery-Microsurgery and Burn Center, General State Hospital of Athens "G Gennimatas", 15343 Athens, Greece.
Antonios KyriakopoulosAndreas Gravvanis, Antonios Kyriakopoulos, Dimosthenis Tsoutsos, Department of Plastic Surgery-Microsurgery and Burn Center, General State Hospital of Athens "G Gennimatas", 15343 Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos KaterosAndreas Gravvanis, Antonios Kyriakopoulos, Dimosthenis Tsoutsos, Department of Plastic Surgery-Microsurgery and Burn Center, General State Hospital of Athens "G Gennimatas", 15343 Athens, Greece.
Dimosthenis TsoutsosAndreas Gravvanis, Antonios Kyriakopoulos, Dimosthenis Tsoutsos, Department of Plastic Surgery-Microsurgery and Burn Center, General State Hospital of Athens "G Gennimatas", 15343 Athens, Greece.
General Hospital of Athens G. Genimatas · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A literature search focusing on flap knee reconstruction revealed much controversy regarding the optimal management of around the knee defects. Muscle flaps are the preferred option, mainly in infected wounds. Perforator flaps have recently been introduced in knee coverage with significant advantages due to low donor morbidity and long pedicles with wide arc of rotation. In the case of free flap the choice of recipient vessels is the key point to the reconstruction. Taking the published experience into account, a reconstructive algorithm is proposed according to the size and location of the wound, the presence of infection and/or 3-dimensional defect.

Indexed as

Free flapKnee reconstructionLocal flapPedicled flapRecipient vessels

Identifiers

PMID25405089
PMCPMC4133468
OpenAlexW1991043500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.