Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25405015›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of urology2014

Complications of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: impact of prebiopsy enema.

Sung Chul Kam, See Min Choi, Sol Yoon, Jae Hui Choi, Seong Hyun Lee, Jeong Seok Hwa, Ky Hyun Chung, Jae Seog Hyun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sung Chul KamDepartment of Urology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
See Min ChoiDepartment of Urology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
Sol YoonDepartment of Urology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
Jae Hui ChoiDepartment of Urology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
Seong Hyun LeeDepartment of Urology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
Jeong Seok HwaDepartment of Urology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
Ky Hyun ChungDepartment of Urology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
Jae Seog HyunDepartment of Urology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTransrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy of the prostate is usually safe. However, some patients are hospitalized owing to complications from TRUS biopsy. We identified the risk factors for complications and effective preventive measures for treating complications after TRUS biopsy. MATERIALS AND

methodsMedical records and radiological images of 1,083 patients who underwent TRUS biopsy of the prostate over 10 years in Gyeongsang National University Hospital were examined retrospectively to investigate the correlation between complications after TRUS biopsy and preventive antibiotics, prebiopsy enema, number of biopsy cores, and pathological findings.

resultsComplications occurred in 69 patients (6.4%). The complication rates of the 1,008 patients who received antibiotics and the 75 patients who did not were 6.3% and 8.0%, respectively (p=0.469). Complication rates of the pre-biopsy enema group (n=658) and the group without prebiopsy enema (n=425) were 4.7% and 8.9%, respectively (p=0.007). Complication rates of the 6-core biopsy group (n=41) and the 12-core biopsy group (n=955) were 7.3% and 6.3%, respectively (p=0.891). Complication rates of the prostate cancer group (n=306) and the no prostate cancer group (n=713) were 6.2% and 6.6%, respectively (p=0.740).

conclusionsA prebiopsy enema was associated with a reduced risk of complications after TRUS biopsy. Preventive antibiotics, number of biopsy cores, and pathological findings did not significantly influence the complication rate.

Indexed as

EndosonographyAgedEnemaHumansImage-Guided BiopsyIncidenceMaleProstatic NeoplasmsProstatitisRectumRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSyncope, VasovagalUrinary RetentionBiopsyComplicationsEnemaProstate

Identifiers

PMID25405015
PMCPMC4231150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.