ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2014
Should I stay or should I go? Conceptual underpinnings of goal-directed actions.
Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03665493 (Dopamine Effect on Inhibitory Control), which is not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dopamine Effect on Inhibitory Control
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Inhibitory Control Development: A Network Neuroscience Perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- The Facial Action Coding System for Characterization of Human Affective Response to Consumer Product-Based Stimuli: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Pooled it
- The relationship between frontal alpha asymmetry and behavioral and brain activity indices of reactive inhibitory control.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Trial
- When two is worse than one: The deleterious impact of multisensory stimulation on response inhibition.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Accelerated Anodal tDCS over Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus Improves Inhibitory Control Across Repeated Sessions: Evidence of a Cumulative After Effect.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Factor Analysis of the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES) and Corresponding Brain Function and Structures.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2026Article
- Reduced striatal dopamine transmission as a transdiagnostic substrate of psychomotor retardation.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Impulsivity, time perception and non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: from behavioral and fNIRS evidence.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Cortical beta power modulation is asymmetric and reduced during movement execution and inhibition in Parkinson's disease.Neurobiology of disease · 2025Article
- Enhancing Human Action Inhibition Through Cortico-Cortical Paired Associative Stimulation.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Article
- From observation to cognition: The impact of watching actions on child thought processes.Psychological research · 2025Article
- Decoding the brain-machine interaction for upper limb assistive technologies: advances and challenges.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Neural Underpinnings of Learning in Dementia Populations: A Review of Motor Learning Studies Combined with Neuroimaging.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024Review
- Detecting Subtle Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Normal Cognition: A Novel Cognitive Control Challenge Task (C3T).Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Beyond Reactive Inhibition: Unpacking the Multifaceted Nature of Motor Inhibition.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Implicit IAT Measures and Neurophysiological fNIRS Markers in Response to High-Engagement Advertising.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Is motor inhibition involved in the processing of sentential negation? An assessment via the Stop-Signal Task.Psychological research · 2023Article
- Strong evidence for ideomotor theory: Unwilled manifestation of the conceptual attribute in movement control.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Representation and decoding of bilateral arm motor imagery using unilateral cerebral LFP signals.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- High-frequency rTMS over the left DLPFC improves the response inhibition control of young healthy participants: an ERP combinedFrontiers in psychology · 2023Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All actions, even the simplest like moving an arm to grasp a pen, are associated with energy costs. Thus all mobile organisms possess the ability to evaluate resources and select those behaviors that are most likely to lead to the greatest accrual of valuable items (reward) in the near or, especially in the case of humans, distant future. The evaluation process is performed at all possible stages of the series of decisions that lead to the building of a goal-directed action or to its suppression. This is because all animals have a limited amount of energy and resources; to survive and be able to reproduce they have to minimize the costs and maximize the outcomes of their actions. These computations are at the root of behavioral flexibility. Two executive functions play a major role in generating flexible behaviors: (i) the ability to predict future outcomes of goal-directed actions; and (ii) the ability to cancel them when they are unlikely to accomplish valuable results. These two processes operate continuously during the entire course of a movement: during its genesis, its planning and even its execution, so that the motor output can be modulated or suppressed at any time before its execution. In this review, functional interactions of the extended neural network subserving generation and inhibition of goal-directed movements will be outlined, leading to the intriguing hypothesis that the performance of actions and their suppression are not specified by independent sets of brain regions. Rather, it will be proposed that acting and stopping are functions emerging from specific interactions between largely overlapping brain regions, whose activity is intimately linked (directly or indirectly) to the evaluations of pros and cons of an action. Such mechanism would allow the brain to perform as a highly efficient and flexible system, as different functions could be computed exploiting the same components operating in different configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.