Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25404886›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2014

Metastatic male breast cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Robert Foerster, Lars Schroeder, Frank Foerster, Volker Wulff, Birgit Schubotz, Dieter Baaske, Christian Rudlowski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Efficacy of chemotherapy in metastatic male breast cancer patients: a retrospective study.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2015
    Article
  9. Male Breast Cancer in the Age of Genetic Testing: An Opportunity for Early Detection, Tailored Therapy, and Surveillance.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert FoersterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lars SchroederDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, Germany.
Frank FoersterDepartment of Economic Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Zwickau, Germany ; Outpatient Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Poliklinik GmbH, Chemnitz, Germany.
Volker WulffCancer Register of Southwest Saxony, Zwickau, Germany.
Birgit SchubotzCancer Register of Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Dieter BaaskeCancer Register of Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Christian RudlowskiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastasized male breast cancer (MMBC) is a rare disease. Given its low incidence, data regarding tumor biology, current treatment options, and survival rates are scarce. PATIENTS AND

methodsA chart review was performed of MMBC patients consecutively registered in regional cancer registries in Germany between 1995 and 2011. Tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival rates were documented and statistically evaluated.

results41 men with MMBC represented 25.6% of a total of 160 patients with MBC. 16 (39%) patients showed primary metastases, and 25 (61%) had recurrent metastases. Median survival from occurrence of metastasis was 32 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 68 months. 68.3% (n = 28) of the cohort received systemic therapy favoring endocrine therapy (n = 25, 61.9%). Prolonged metastatic OS (p = 0.02) was observed in patients having had a systemic treatment. Metastatic patients having received endocrine treatment showed significantly prolonged survival rates. Furthermore, patients receiving palliative chemotherapy had a significant survival benefit compared to those in whom chemotherapy was omitted.

conclusionOur results suggest that systemic treatment in the form of both palliative chemotherapy and endocrine therapy improves outcome of R. Foerster and L. Schroeder contributed equally to this article and are listed in alphabetical order. MMBC. Therefore, it seems reasonable that treatment of MMBC should be based on the guidelines for female breast cancer.

Indexed as

Male breast cancerMetastasisPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID25404886
PMCPMC4209274
OpenAlexW2030279039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.