Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25404331›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Complex two-component signaling regulates the general stress response in Alphaproteobacteria.

Andreas Kaczmarczyk, Ramon Hochstrasser, Julia A Vorholt, Anne Francez-Charlot

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreas KaczmarczykDepartment of Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Ramon HochstrasserDepartment of Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Julia A VorholtDepartment of Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Anne Francez-CharlotDepartment of Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland fanne@micro.biol.ethz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The general stress response (GSR) in Alphaproteobacteria was recently shown to be controlled by a partner-switching mechanism that is triggered by phosphorylation of the response regulator PhyR. Activation of PhyR ultimately results in release of the alternative extracytoplasmic function sigma factor σ(EcfG), which redirects transcription toward the GSR. Little is known about the signal transduction pathway(s) controlling PhyR phosphorylation. Here, we identified the single-domain response regulator (SDRR) SdrG and seven histidine kinases, PakA to PakG, belonging to the HWE/HisKA2 family as positive modulators of the GSR in Sphingomonas melonis Fr1. Phenotypic analyses, epistasis experiments, and in vitro phosphorylation assays indicate that Paks directly phosphorylate PhyR and SdrG, and that SdrG acts upstream of or in concert with PhyR, modulating its activity in a nonlinear pathway. Furthermore, we found that additional SDRRs negatively affect the GSR in a way that strictly requires PhyR and SdrG. Finally, analysis of GSR activation by thermal, osmotic, and oxidative stress indicates that Paks display different degrees of redundancy and that a specific kinase can sense multiple stresses, suggesting that the GSR senses a particular condition as a combination of, rather than individual, molecular cues. This study thus establishes the alphaproteobacterial GSR as a complex and interlinked network of two-component systems, in which multiple histidine kinases converge to PhyR, the phosphorylation of which is, in addition, subject to regulation by several SDRRs. Our finding that most HWE/HisKA2 kinases contribute to the GSR in S. melonis Fr1 opens the possibility that this notion might also be true for other Alphaproteobacteria.

Indexed as

AlphaproteobacteriaAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsBlotting, WesternEthanolGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHistidine KinaseIsoenzymesModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataMutationPhosphorylationProtein KinasesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSequence Homology, Amino AcidSigma FactorBacterial ProteinsEthanolHistidine KinaseIsoenzymesProtein KinasesSigma FactorSodium Chloridetert-ButylhydroperoxideECF sigma factorgeneral stress responsehistidine kinaseresponse regulatortwo-component system

Identifiers

PMID25404331
PMCPMC4260549
OpenAlexW2008424479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.