ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014
Complex two-component signaling regulates the general stress response in Alphaproteobacteria.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- An HWE-Family Histidine Kinase Modulates Brucella Cell Envelope Properties and Host Innate Immune Response.Molecular microbiology · 2025Article
- Variations in kinase and effector signaling logic in a bacterial two component signaling network.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025Article
- Variations in kinase and effector signaling logic in a bacterial two component signaling network.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A respiro-fermentative strategy to survive nanoxia in Acidobacterium capsulatum.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024Article
- sRNA molecules participate in hyperosmotic stress response regulation inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Relationships between Phyllosphere Bacterial Communities and Leaf Functional Traits in a Temperate Forest.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The role of CenKR in the coordination ofmBio · 2023Article
- The functional differences between paralogous regulators define the control of the general stress response in Sphingopyxis granuli TFA.Environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- The ChvG-ChvI and NtrY-NtrX Two-Component Systems Coordinately Regulate Growth of Caulobacter crescentus.Journal of bacteriology · 2021Article
- Extracytoplasmic Function σ Factors as Tools for Coordinating Stress Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Adaptive matching between phyllosphere bacteria and their tree hosts in a neotropical forest.Microbiome · 2020Article
- Two paralogous EcfG σ factors hierarchically orchestrate the activation of the General Stress Response in Sphingopyxis granuli TFA.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Shining light on the alphaproteobacterial general stress response: Comment on: Fiebig et al., Mol Microbiol, 2019.Molecular microbiology · 2019Article
- Regulation of the Erythrobacter litoralis DSM 8509 general stress response by visible light.Molecular microbiology · 2019Article
- Complex general stress response regulation in Sphingomonas melonis Fr1 revealed by transcriptional analyses.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Regulation of bacterial surface attachment by a network of sensory transduction proteins.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Flexibility and constraint: Evolutionary remodeling of the sporulation initiation pathway in Firmicutes.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The general stress response (GSR) in Alphaproteobacteria was recently shown to be controlled by a partner-switching mechanism that is triggered by phosphorylation of the response regulator PhyR. Activation of PhyR ultimately results in release of the alternative extracytoplasmic function sigma factor σ(EcfG), which redirects transcription toward the GSR. Little is known about the signal transduction pathway(s) controlling PhyR phosphorylation. Here, we identified the single-domain response regulator (SDRR) SdrG and seven histidine kinases, PakA to PakG, belonging to the HWE/HisKA2 family as positive modulators of the GSR in Sphingomonas melonis Fr1. Phenotypic analyses, epistasis experiments, and in vitro phosphorylation assays indicate that Paks directly phosphorylate PhyR and SdrG, and that SdrG acts upstream of or in concert with PhyR, modulating its activity in a nonlinear pathway. Furthermore, we found that additional SDRRs negatively affect the GSR in a way that strictly requires PhyR and SdrG. Finally, analysis of GSR activation by thermal, osmotic, and oxidative stress indicates that Paks display different degrees of redundancy and that a specific kinase can sense multiple stresses, suggesting that the GSR senses a particular condition as a combination of, rather than individual, molecular cues. This study thus establishes the alphaproteobacterial GSR as a complex and interlinked network of two-component systems, in which multiple histidine kinases converge to PhyR, the phosphorylation of which is, in addition, subject to regulation by several SDRRs. Our finding that most HWE/HisKA2 kinases contribute to the GSR in S. melonis Fr1 opens the possibility that this notion might also be true for other Alphaproteobacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.