Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25404315›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Neural precursor-specific expression of multiple Drosophila genes is driven by dual enhancer modules with overlapping function.

Steven W Miller, Mark Rebeiz, Jenny E Atanasov, James W Posakony

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Regulatory Changes in the Fatty Acid ElongasebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Modular tissue-specific regulation ofDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Regulatory logic driving stable levels ofDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven W MillerDivision of Biological Sciences/CDB, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Mark RebeizDivision of Biological Sciences/CDB, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Jenny E AtanasovDivision of Biological Sciences/CDB, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
James W PosakonyDivision of Biological Sciences/CDB, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 jposakony@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-1732
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

GENETIC MECHANISMS AND REGULATIONT32GM007240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAMPTON, RANDOLPH Y. · 1985 to 2019
$23.8M
MOLECULAR GENETICS OF SENSORY ORGAN DEVELOPMENTR01GM046993 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI POSAKONY, JAMES W. · 1992 to 2015
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32GM007240NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046993NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM046993NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptional cis-regulatory modules (CRMs), or enhancers, are responsible for directing gene expression in specific territories and cell types during development. In some instances, the same gene may be served by two or more enhancers with similar specificities. Here we show that the utilization of dual, or "shadow", enhancers is a common feature of genes that are active specifically in neural precursor (NP) cells in Drosophila. By genome-wide computational discovery of statistically significant clusters of binding motifs for both proneural activator (P) proteins and basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) repressor (R) factors (a "P+R" regulatory code), we have identified NP-specific enhancer modules associated with multiple genes expressed in this cell type. These CRMs are distinct from those previously identified for the corresponding gene, establishing the existence of a dual-enhancer arrangement in which both modules reside close to the gene they serve. Using wild-type and mutant reporter gene constructs in vivo, we show that P sites in these modules mediate activation by proneural factors in "proneural cluster" territories, whereas R sites mediate repression by bHLH repressors, which serves to restrict expression specifically to NP cells. To our knowledge, our results identify the first direct targets of these bHLH repressors. Finally, using genomic rescue constructs for neuralized (neur), we demonstrate that each of the gene's two NP-specific enhancers is sufficient to rescue neur function in the lateral inhibition process by which adult sensory organ precursor (SOP) cells are specified, but that deletion of both enhancers results in failure of this event.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBinding SitesDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticImmunohistochemistryMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataMutationNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNuclear ProteinsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsDrosophila Proteinsneur protein, DrosophilaNuclear Proteinsphyl protein, Drosophilasens protein, DrosophilaTranscription FactorsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesbHLH repressorscis-regulatory codedual enhancer modulesneural precursorsproneural proteins

Identifiers

PMID25404315
PMCPMC4260543
OpenAlexW2040855940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.