ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014
Neural precursor-specific expression of multiple Drosophila genes is driven by dual enhancer modules with overlapping function.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clustered cytoneme interactions contribute to peripheral nervous system patterning in Drosophila.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Regulatory changes in the fatty acid elongase eloF underlie the evolution of sex-specific pheromone profiles in Drosophila prolongata.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Regulatory Changes in the Fatty Acid ElongasebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Notch-Dependent Expression of theGenes · 2024Article
- Sex-specific evolution of a Drosophila sensory system via interacting cis- and trans-regulatory changes.Evolution & development · 2022Article
- Tissue-wide coordination of epithelium-to-neural stem cell transition in the Drosophila optic lobe requires Neuralized.The Journal of cell biology · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Regulation of Notch output dynamics via specific E(spl)-HLH factors during bristle patterning in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Modular tissue-specific regulation ofDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019Article
- Redundant and Cryptic Enhancer Activities of theGenetics · 2019Article
- Lateral inhibition: Two modes of non-autonomous negative autoregulation by neuralized.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Automated tools for comparative sequence analysis of genic regions using the GenePalette application.Developmental biology · 2017Article
- Regulatory logic driving stable levels ofDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2017Article
- Enhancer additivity and non-additivity are determined by enhancer strength in the Drosophila embryo.eLife · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptional cis-regulatory modules (CRMs), or enhancers, are responsible for directing gene expression in specific territories and cell types during development. In some instances, the same gene may be served by two or more enhancers with similar specificities. Here we show that the utilization of dual, or "shadow", enhancers is a common feature of genes that are active specifically in neural precursor (NP) cells in Drosophila. By genome-wide computational discovery of statistically significant clusters of binding motifs for both proneural activator (P) proteins and basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) repressor (R) factors (a "P+R" regulatory code), we have identified NP-specific enhancer modules associated with multiple genes expressed in this cell type. These CRMs are distinct from those previously identified for the corresponding gene, establishing the existence of a dual-enhancer arrangement in which both modules reside close to the gene they serve. Using wild-type and mutant reporter gene constructs in vivo, we show that P sites in these modules mediate activation by proneural factors in "proneural cluster" territories, whereas R sites mediate repression by bHLH repressors, which serves to restrict expression specifically to NP cells. To our knowledge, our results identify the first direct targets of these bHLH repressors. Finally, using genomic rescue constructs for neuralized (neur), we demonstrate that each of the gene's two NP-specific enhancers is sufficient to rescue neur function in the lateral inhibition process by which adult sensory organ precursor (SOP) cells are specified, but that deletion of both enhancers results in failure of this event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.