Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25404207›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2014

Comparison of detection methods to estimate asexual Plasmodium falciparum parasite prevalence and gametocyte carriage in a community survey in Tanzania.

Felista Mwingira, Blaise Genton, Abdu-Noor M Kabanywanyi, Ingrid Felger

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Persistence ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AsymptomaticJournal of tropical medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Droplet Digital PCR for the Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Problems Associated with the Diagnosis of Imported Malaria in Anhui Province, China.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Direct Estimation of Sensitivity ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Felista Mwingira
Blaise Genton
Abdu-Noor M Kabanywanyi
Ingrid FelgerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4002 Basel, Switzerland. ingrid.felger@unibas.ch.
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHIfakara Health Institute · TZUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of molecular techniques to detect malaria parasites has been advocated to improve the accuracy of parasite prevalence estimates, especially in moderate to low endemic settings. Molecular work is time-consuming and costly, thus the effective gains of this technique need to be carefully evaluated. Light microscopy (LM) and rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) are commonly used to detect malaria infection in resource constrained areas, but their limited sensitivity results in underestimation of the proportion of people infected with Plasmodium falciparum. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of missed infections via a community survey in Tanzania, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect P. falciparum parasites and gametocytes.

methodsThree hundred and thirty individuals of all ages from the Kilombero and Ulanga districts (Tanzania) were enrolled in a cross-sectional survey. Finger prick blood samples were collected for parasite detection by RDT, LM and molecular diagnosis using quantitative 18S rRNA PCR and msp2 nPCR. Gametocytes were detected by LM and by amplifying transcripts of the gametocyte-specific marker pfs25.

resultsResults from all three diagnostic methods were available for a subset of 226 individuals. Prevalence of P. falciparum was 38% (86/226; 95% CI 31.9-44.4%) by qPCR, 15.9% (36/226; 95% CI 11.1-20.7%) by RDT and 5.8% (13/226; 95% CI 2.69- 8.81%) by LM. qPCR was positive for 72% (26/36) of the RDT-positive samples. Gametocyte prevalence was 10.6% (24/226) by pfs25-qRT-PCR and 1.2% by LM.

conclusionsLM showed the poorest performance, detecting only 15% of P. falciparum parasite carriers identified by PCR. Thus, LM is not a sufficiently accurate technique from which to inform policies and malaria control or elimination efforts. The diagnostic performance of RDT was superior to that of LM. However, it is also insufficient when precise prevalence data are needed for monitoring intervention success or for determining point prevalence rates in countrywide surveillance. Detection of gametocytes by PCR was 10-times more sensitive than by LM. These findings support the need for molecular techniques to accurately estimate the human infectious reservoir and hence the transmission potential in a population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, ProtozoanCarrier StateChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalFemaleHumansInfantAntigens, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanDNA, Ribosomalmerozoite surface protein 2, PlasmodiumPfs25 protein, Plasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID25404207
PMCPMC4246543
OpenAlexW2112980231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.