Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25403888›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2015

Surgical treatment of incidental gallbladder cancer discovered during or following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Yuan-Hu Tian, Xu Ji, Bo Liu, Guang-Yun Yang, Xiang-Fei Meng, Hong-Tian Xia, Jing Wang, Zhi-Qiang Huang, Jia-Hong Dong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. LaparoscopicWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bile spillage and incidental gall bladder adenocarcinoma.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuan-Hu TianHospital & Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China, tianyh301@163.com.
Xu Ji
Bo Liu
Guang-Yun Yang
Xiang-Fei Meng
Hong-Tian Xia
Jing Wang
Zhi-Qiang Huang
Jia-Hong Dong
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal surgical management of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) and their long-term survival remains unclear.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the long-term prognosis of patients with IGBC diagnosed during or after LC.

methodsBetween January 2002 and January 2012, a total of 7,582 consecutive patients underwent LC for presumed gallbladder benign disease in the Chinese PLA General Hospital, China. Among them, 69 patients (0.91%) were diagnosed to have IGBC. Their medical records, imaging data, surgery records, pathological findings, and survival data were retrospectively reviewed.

resultsMedian age was 61 years (range: 34-83). After a median follow-up period of 61 months, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients were 89.9, 78.3, and 76.8%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates of patients with T1a, T1b, T2, and T3 stages were 95.5, 93.8, 69.2, and 44.4%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates in simple LC (n = 45), converted to open extended cholecystectomy (n = 16), and radical second resection (n = 8) groups were 91.1, 37.5, and 75.0%, respectively. Local port-site tumor recurrence was identified in one patient. Prognostic factors including depth of invasion, lymph node status, vascular or neural invasion, tumor differentiation, extent of resection, bile spillage, and type of surgery were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

conclusionsSimple LC is appropriate for T1a patients with clear margin and unbroken gallbladder, whereas extended radical resection is recommended for patients with T1b or more advanced IGBC. An intact surgical specimen and the use of plastic retrieval bags are important to reduce the risk of port-site recurrences and disease relapse. Early diagnosis, meticulous perioperative assessment, and precise surgery are essential factors to obtain good results in IGBC treatment.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicNeoplasm SeedingAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCholecystectomyConversion to Open SurgeryFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsHumansIncidental FindingsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Invasiveness

Identifiers

PMID25403888
OpenAlexW1986840815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.