ArticleBMC oral health2014
Socioeconomic differences in self-rated oral health and dental care utilisation after the dental care reform in 2008 in Sweden.
Article in BMC oral health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public Oral Healthcare Utilisation and Its Associated Factors in Malaysian Adults: A Time-Series Analysis (1992-2019).International dental journal · 2026Article
- Association of preventive dental scaling with income status and changes: a population-based study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Associations Between Diverse Beverage Consumption Patterns and Oral Health: Evidence from a National Survey in Hungary.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Patient-Centred Preferences for Autonomy and Information-Seeking Among Periodontal Patients in Dental Decision Making.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Article
- Exploring the link between self-rated poor oral health and cardiovascular risk: a cross-sectional study using SCORE2.BMC oral health · 2025Observational
- Oral Health Knowledge, Attitude, And Practices Among Residents Of Al-kharj, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-sectional Study.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Article
- Predictors of Oral Health in Young Swedish Adults: A Register-Based Observational Study.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Refraining from seeking dental care among the Sámi in Sweden: a cross-sectional study.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Ten-year cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment and factors associated with unfavourable self-rated oral health in older adults in the United States.Gerodontology · 2024Article
- Article
- How an increase in income affects the use of dental care services among a low-income population: evidence from the Finnish basic income experiment.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Identification of caries-active individuals in longitudinal data a methodological study using a national registry.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Impact of an oral care subsidization reform on intersectional inequities in self-rated oral health in Sweden.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Article
- A study of socio-economic inequalities in self-reported oral and general health in South-East Norway.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Burden of Oral Diseases and Access to Oral Care in an Ageing Society.International dental journal · 2022Review
- "To enroll or not to enroll": a qualitative study on preferences for dental insurance in Iran.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Oral Health-Related Knowledge, Attitude and Practice among Patients in Rural Areas around Cluj-Napoca, Romania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Associations of Medical Visits with Dentist Visits: A Register-Linkage Study of a Working-Age Population in Finland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aims of this study were to determine self-rated oral health and dental attendance habits among Swedish adults, with special reference to the role of social inequalities, after the Swedish dental care reform in 2008.
methodsThe study is based on a survey questionnaire, sent to 12,235 residents of a Swedish county, in 2012. The age group was 16-84 years: 5,999 (49%) responded. Using chi-square statistics, differences in prevalence of self-rated oral health and regular dental attendance were analysed with respect to gender, age, educational level, family status, employment status and country of birth. Self-rated poor oral health was analysed by multivarite logistic regression adjusting for the different socio-demographic factors, financial security and having refrained from dental treatment for financial reasons.
resultsThree out of four respondents (75%) reported fairly good or very good oral health. Almost 90% claimed to be regular dental attenders. Those who were financially secure reported better oral health. The differences in oral health between those with a cash margin and those without were large whereas the differences between age groups were rather small. About 8% reported that they had refrained from dental treatment for financial reasons during the last three months. Self-rated poor oral health was most common among the unemployed, those on disability pension or on long-term sick leave, those born outside the Nordic countries and those with no cash margin (odds ratios ranging from 2.4 to 4.4). The most important factor contributing to these differences was having refrained from dental treatment for financial reasons.
conclusionThe results are relevant to strategies intended to reduce social inequalities in oral health, affirming the importance of the provision of equitable access to dental care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.