Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25403681›Full record

Trial reportArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2014

Treatment of lupus nephritis with abatacept: the Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Efficacy and Safety Study.

ACCESS Trial Group

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00774852 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Phase II Multicenter Trial of CTLA4Ig), which is not on this map. Cited by 120 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00774852 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Phase II Multicenter Trial of CTLA4Ig (Abatacept) Plus Cyclophosphamide vs Cyclophosphamide Alone in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2008 to 2014Enrolled137ConditionsLupus Nephritis, Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicArmsabatacept, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, prednisone, abatacept placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Immunosuppressive treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A population-scale atlas of blood and tissue in lupus nephritis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Importance of B cells (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Aranow, Cynthia [added]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

ACCESS Trial Group

Funding

Transplantation GroupUM2AI117870 · NIAID · RHO FEDERAL SYSTEMS DIVISION, INC. · PI DAVID, GLORIA · 2015 to 2023
$208.1M
IMMUNE TOLERANCE NETWORK-266015416-266015416N01AI015416 · NIAID · REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF C · PI BLUESTONE, JEFFREY A · 2002 to 2006
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI015416NIAID NIH HHS UM2 AI117870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of a 24-week course of abatacept in the treatment of active lupus nephritis and to assess the potential of abatacept to induce "clinical tolerance," defined as sustained clinical quiescence of lupus nephritis after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy.

methodsPatients with active lupus nephritis (n = 134) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind phase II add-on trial in which they received either abatacept or placebo in conjunction with the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial regimen of low-dose cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA). The primary efficacy outcome was the frequency of complete response at week 24. Thereafter, patients who met either complete or partial response criteria continued blinded treatment through week 52. During this phase of the study, subjects in the abatacept treatment group in whom a complete response was achieved at week 24 discontinued immunosuppressive therapy other than prednisone (10 mg/day).

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences between groups with respect to the primary outcome or any of the secondary outcomes, including measures of safety. A complete response was achieved in 33% of the subjects in the treatment group and in 31% of the subjects in the control group at week 24. Fifty percent of the subjects in the treatment group who met complete response criteria and therefore discontinued immunosuppressive therapy at week 24 maintained their complete response status through week 52.

conclusionThe addition of abatacept to a regimen of CYC followed by AZA did not improve the outcome of lupus nephritis at either 24 or 52 weeks. No worrisome safety signals were encountered.

Indexed as

AbataceptAdultAntirheumatic AgentsCyclophosphamideDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansImmunoconjugatesLupus NephritisMaleTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAbataceptAntirheumatic AgentsCyclophosphamideImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID25403681
PMCPMC4528976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.