Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25403624›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2014

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: 15-years' experience in a single center.

Ming Wang, Jia Xu, Yun Zhang, Lin Tu, Wei-Qing Qiu, Chao-Jie Wang, Yan-Ying Shen, Qiang Liu, Hui Cao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. GIST: Correlation of risk classifications and outcome.Journal of medicine and life · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Effect of Gastrointestinal Bleeding on Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  14. Clinicopathological and Prognostic Analysis of Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Presenting with Gastrointestinal Bleeding: a 10-Year Retrospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ming Wang
Jia Xu
Yun Zhang
Lin Tu
Wei-Qing Qiu
Chao-Jie Wang
Yan-Ying Shen
Qiang Liu
Hui CaoDepartment of General Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Floor 11, Building 7, NO, 1630, Dongfang Road, Shanghai 200127, China. caohuishcn@hotmail.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNRenji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is known for its wide variability in biological behaviors and it is difficult to predict its malignant potential. The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics and prognostic factors of GIST.

methodsClinical and pathological data of 497 GIST patients in our center between 1997 and 2012 were reviewed.

resultsPatients were categorized into very low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups according to modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus classification system. Among the 401 patients untreated with imatinib mesylate (IM), 5-year overall survival (OS) in very low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups was 100%, 100%, 89.6% and 65.9%; and 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 100%, 98.1%, 90.9% and 44.5%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that sex, tumor size, mitotic rate, risk grade, CD34 expression, and adjacent involvement were predictors of OS or RFS. COX hazard proportional model (Forward LR) showed that large tumor size, high mitotic rate, and high risk grade were independent risk factors to OS, whereas high mitotic rate, high risk grade and adjacent organ involvement were independent risk factors to RFS. The intermediate-high risk patients who received IM adjuvant therapy (n = 87) had better 5-year OS and RFS than those who did not (n = 188) (94.9% vs. 72.1; 82.3% vs. 56.3%, respectively). Similarly, advanced GIST patients underwent IM therapy (n = 45) had better 3-year OS and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) than those who didn't (n = 42) (75.6% vs. 6.8%; 87.6% vs. 12.4%, respectively).

conclusionsVery low- and low-risk GISTs can be treated with surgery alone. Large tumor size, high mitotic rate, high risk grade, and adjacent organ involvement contribute to the poor outcome. IM therapy significantly improves the survival of intermediate-high risk or advanced GIST patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylateLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesImatinib MesylatePiperazinesPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID25403624
PMCPMC4254179
OpenAlexW1989912467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.