ArticleBMC surgery2014
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: 15-years' experience in a single center.
Article in BMC surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Hemostasis for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Hemorrhage: A Case Series and Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors.DEN open · 2026Article
- Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: 10-Year Experience in Cancer Center-The Ottawa Hospital (TOH).Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- GIST: Correlation of risk classifications and outcome.Journal of medicine and life · 2022Article
- Enhancer of zeste homolog 2-mediated paired box 8 methylation promotes gastrointestinal stromal tumor progression through Wnt4 downregulation.Cancer gene therapy · 2021Article
- A Retrospective Study of Postoperative Outcomes in 98 Patients Diagnosed with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) of the Upper, Middle, and Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Between 2009 and 2019 at a Single Center in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
- Article
- The prognostic value of gastrointestinal bleeding in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A propensity score matching analysis.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- Comparative clinical features and short-term outcomes of gastric and small intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Journal of Cancer · 2019Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Chinese patients.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Standard Approach to Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - Differences between China and Europe.Visceral medicine · 2018Review
- Effect of Gastrointestinal Bleeding on Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- Clinicopathological and Prognostic Analysis of Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Presenting with Gastrointestinal Bleeding: a 10-Year Retrospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017Article
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Associated with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Simulating a Neurofibrosarcoma in a Black African Adult Patient.Case reports in gastroenterologyArticle
- Impact of Prognostic Nutritional Index on Terminal Cancer Patients.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is known for its wide variability in biological behaviors and it is difficult to predict its malignant potential. The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics and prognostic factors of GIST.
methodsClinical and pathological data of 497 GIST patients in our center between 1997 and 2012 were reviewed.
resultsPatients were categorized into very low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups according to modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus classification system. Among the 401 patients untreated with imatinib mesylate (IM), 5-year overall survival (OS) in very low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups was 100%, 100%, 89.6% and 65.9%; and 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 100%, 98.1%, 90.9% and 44.5%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that sex, tumor size, mitotic rate, risk grade, CD34 expression, and adjacent involvement were predictors of OS or RFS. COX hazard proportional model (Forward LR) showed that large tumor size, high mitotic rate, and high risk grade were independent risk factors to OS, whereas high mitotic rate, high risk grade and adjacent organ involvement were independent risk factors to RFS. The intermediate-high risk patients who received IM adjuvant therapy (n = 87) had better 5-year OS and RFS than those who did not (n = 188) (94.9% vs. 72.1; 82.3% vs. 56.3%, respectively). Similarly, advanced GIST patients underwent IM therapy (n = 45) had better 3-year OS and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) than those who didn't (n = 42) (75.6% vs. 6.8%; 87.6% vs. 12.4%, respectively).
conclusionsVery low- and low-risk GISTs can be treated with surgery alone. Large tumor size, high mitotic rate, high risk grade, and adjacent organ involvement contribute to the poor outcome. IM therapy significantly improves the survival of intermediate-high risk or advanced GIST patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.